New Eagles defensive end Michael Bennett, who has been indicted on the felony charge of injury to the elderly — which is punishable by up to ten years in prison and/or a $10K fine — is expected to turn himself in tomorrow, per Tom Schad and A.J. Perez of USA Today. Bennett is represented by Rusty Hardin, the well-known Houston defense attorney who has represented Roger Clemens and other high-profile clients. Per Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer, Hardin indicated that Bennett is currently out of the continental United States and that, as he has not yet met his client, he will refrain from speaking on his behalf at this time.
Once Bennett turns himself in, more specifics will begin to emerge. As of right now, we have the press release from the Harris County District Attorney’s Office noting that Bennett has been indicted, a few details from various sources, and a whole host of unanswered questions.
Zack Rosenblatt of NJ Advance Media took a look at some of those questions yesterday, most of which pertained to the on-field ramifications of the incident (i.e. will the Eagles release Bennett, will they make any precautionary moves to shore up the defensive line, etc.). Today, one of Rosenblatt’s colleagues at NJ Advance Media, Eliot Shorr-Parks, examines the curiosities surrounding the case and sets forth his opinion as to why the Harris County DA will have a difficult time proving its case.
For instance, despite witnessing the alleged assault, a police officer at the scene did not attempt to arrest Bennett and instead allowed him on the field. According to Houston Chief Police officer Art Acevedo, speaking at a press conference on Friday, that was because Bennett was much larger than the officer at the scene, who was operating as a “one-man unit,” and because the officer needed to continue to monitor his area and did not perceive Bennett to be an additional threat to anyone else. Nonetheless, Shorr-Parks wonders why Bennett was not arrested after the post-game commotion if the incident was serious enough to warrant an indictment.
Shorr-Parks also observes that there is no video of the incident, which could certainly complicate matters for the prosecution. He also wonders why the case sat for three months before it was assigned to a detective, and why it took roughly five months from the time the last interview was conducted during the police department’s investigation — with the NRG stadium security manager in October 2017 — to the issuance of the arrest warrant. Finally, he sees Acevedo’s personal attacks against Bennett — Acevedo called Bennett “morally bankrupt” during his press conference — as another red flag.
The police department and DA, of course, have answers for all of those questions, and since it has procured the indictment, it is unlikely the DA will simply dismiss the case without a fight. And regardless of the ultimate outcome, McLane writes that Bennett, always a polarizing figure, has already become a major distraction for the defending Super Bowl champs. Eagles brass will doubtlessly have to answer questions concerning Bennett during league meetings in Orlando this week, but McLane believes the team may have to ride out the storm with him instead of cutting him loose (though Philadelphia could release him and save $5.65MM in cap space without incurring any dead money).
??
He can’t go to jail for that
He can’t go to jail for committing a felony? Interesting take.
5 months?? 3 months?? it’s only been less than 2 months since the Superbowl.
This was the previous Super Bowl, Falcons Pats, when Martellus was playing for NE.
Thanks for clarifying because I was confused about that too
The incident happened at Super Bowl 51 not 52.
Y’know what we need? More lawyers from Texas named Rusty.
I once knew a horse named Rusty, no offense.
Did he at least have some defense?
I’m telling complete strangers “defense win championships”
Well it does.
I know!
Or more guys named Matlock
But his sister denied over and over on Twitter that he did anything wrong and said she had evidence.
Highly useful comment. Thanks
Oh, that changes everything.
I meant to add more to that. If she had the evidence she said repeatedly she had why would he turn himself in? Oh wait, SHE LIED!
Statue of limitations does not apply? Can you sue people for an event that happened years ago? Apparently so, at least in this case. Should be interesting.
The statute of limitations in Texas for the crimes he is accused of, is ten years.
This forum raises more of an issue of statue of limitations on intelligence and why some are so limited.
“Why didn’t the officer arrest him on scene”
And if he did Bennett and his defenders would cry racism.
Dindu nuffin
All the legal points and issues probably won’t matter in the long run. Goodell and the NFL are rigidly opposed to anything that reflects negatively on the public image of the league they try to create. Bennett will take his place along side players like Colin Kaepernick, Ray Rice, Aaron Hernandez who destroyed once promising careers.
I bet you are cross-eyed in real life.
Dindu nuffin
Gets funnier every time you repeat it…
This guy already burned his Race card. He can still play his Fat & Stupid card but after that he’s done.
Bennett is a bonafide scumbag. I hope the thug fries.
I like the excuse they couldn’t find him in the chaos, and then the pictures of him with passes and up on the TV broadcast w his brother.
The Eagles will keep him if he is found innocent or the charges are dropped. The case against Bennet is very weak at best and the charges will be dropped.