A trade rental in the wake of what turned out to be a season-ending Aidan Hutchinson injury, Za’Darius Smith made some notable contributions for a depleted Lions team. Detroit, however, released the veteran edge rusher prior to a $7MM option bonus kicking in.
This marked the second time an NFC North team had made Smith a cap casualty in four years, as the Packers made the same move in 2022. That led Smith to Minnesota, Cleveland and then Detroit. The Browns huddled up on a new contract with Smith a year after trading for him, and the Lions are not closing the book on doing the same.
GM Brad Holmes has remained in contact with Smith’s camp about a potential reunion, per Detroitfootball.net’s Justin Rogers. Holmes said the veteran pass rusher’s price will need to come down before a reunion becomes a strong possibility.
“We couldn’t afford it is the bottom line. You know? That was my communication with him and he understood that,” Holmes said. “... Look, he played some good snaps for us and he made plays for us when we acquired him, so we would have loved to be able to keep him. We just weren’t able to.”
The Lions included a 2025 fifth-rounder and a 2026 sixth in a pick-swap deal for Smith at the deadline last year; the terms were similar to the Vikings-Browns trade from 2023. Smith finished with a nine-sack 2024; he registered four to go with 10 QB hits as a Lion. Altogether, Smith was more productive last season than he was in 2023. He also has stayed healthy since a back injury wiped out most of his 2021 season, having missed just two games over the past three years. That said, Smith will turn 33 just before Week 1. And the Lions have a market-setting Hutchinson payment on their radar.
“We had so many of these young players that have been on rookie deals, and we’ve been enjoying the impact that they’ve all been bringing,” Holmes said. “But now, a bill is coming. What you spend this year is going to impact next year. It even impacts 2027. So, that’s the discipline that we have to adhere to.”
In addition to hopeful paydays for Hutchinson and Kerby Joseph, Brian Branch, Jahmyr Gibbs and Sam LaPorta will become extension-eligible in 2026. The 2024 deals for Penei Sewell, Amon-Ra St. Brown, Jared Goff and Taylor Decker will produce higher cap numbers down the road as well. These matters may not interfere much with another Smith contract, due to the nomadic EDGE being close to year-to-year status at this point, but Holmes is certainly cognizant of his team’s evolving financial model.
Detroit brought back Marcus Davenport despite back-to-back seasons marred by major injuries. Davenport is on a one-year, $2.5MM deal. Smith, who has three double-digit sack seasons on his resume, will be aiming higher. But the 10-year vet returning on a lower-cost deal will be a storyline to monitor in Detroit this offseason. How the Lions fare in the draft, as a low-cost Hutchinson complementary rusher will be vital once the ace pass rusher is on a $40MM-plus-AAV extension, will also play a central role in determining if the team still needs Smith for 2025.
No reason Smith should have to take a cheap deal coming off of a near 10 sack season.
He just might have to wait until after the draft to see who offers him something closer to what he wants. Teams might understandably want to see what edge rushers are available for them in the draft and wait until free agent signings no longer impact comp picks.
Yeah, I’d love him back, but at the end of the day it’s a business. If ZSmith is worth more than the Lions can reasonably afford to another team, by all means get that bag as he’s reaching his mid 30s.
Bring him back and let’s go get the Super Bowl!!!
Would love to see the Lions re-sign Smith as he’ll provide great rotational value to the Edge position.
He will be back in Detroit, I’d almost guarantee it. They couldn’t afford that $7M bonus payment and ZS knew that. He loved his time in DET and I think he’ll love playing opposite Hutch with an the double teams he gets. He’ll be back and he’ll have a great statistical season. Much like his younger days opposite M. Garrett