D.K. Metcalf recently caught passes from Aaron Rodgers, who has been a Steelers free agent target for weeks. Although Metcalf scored his coveted extension, being part of Pittsburgh’s Rodgers recruitment did not appear to be his goal upon hitting the trade market in earnest this offseason.
The Steelers came up as a Metcalf suitor before last year’s deadline, but the Seahawks shot down talks. Metcalf, however, made it known he wanted a trade prior to requesting one this year, ESPN.com’s Brady Henderson reports. Pittsburgh also did not emerge as the Pro Bowl wideout’s preferred destination.
With the Steelers lacking quarterback clarity, it makes sense they were not the seventh-year veteran’s priority landing spot. Though, Metcalf also made it known, per Henderson, he did not want to be traded to the Patriots. Despite New England now having a long-term QB hopeful in Drake Maye, Metcalf was not interested in a deal that sent him there. He follows Brandon Aiyuk in passing on such a deal.
The Patriots showed interest this year, which is unsurprising given their enduring effort to upgrade at wide receiver, but they did not ultimately make an offer. That may well be the case because Metcalf made it known he did not want to end up in Foxborough. The Pats were prepared to pursue him in a trade, Henderson adds. This fit not coming to fruition follows a summer Aiyuk effort that involved the Pats being linked to a $32MM-per-year offer — the highest known extension price during those trade sweepstakes — only to not land on the WR’s list. The Steelers instead emerged as Aiyuk’s top 49ers competition, with the Commanders being a destination as well.
Washington did not come up for Metcalf, but Henderson indicates Houston and Los Angeles did. The Texans and Chargers instead emerged as the wideout’s preferred destinations, confirming a previous report that the receiver had eyed those AFC squads. Though, the Seahawks needed to both find a Metcalf landing spot that appeased the receiver, one willing to meet the team’s price point and one willing to sign off on an upper-crust extension. The Steelers ended up checking those boxes, giving Metcalf a $32.99MM-per-year deal — one coming with $60MM at signing — to end their lengthy WR pursuit.
Given Metcalf’s success in Seattle, it is interesting he requested a move. The team had seen Geno Smith morph from roster afterthought to Comeback Player of the Year. Metcalf’s numbers vacillated during Smith’s time as Seattle’s starter. After a 1,300-yard season in Russell Wilson‘s final healthy Seahawks slate, Metcalf posted two sub-1,000-yard years (2021, 2024).
Last season, Jaxon Smith-Njigba emerged as Seattle’s top weapon — to the point Mike Macdonald prioritized an OC who would help reignite Metcalf. Now, he and Smith are out of the picture. Macdonald’s OC search highlighted an interest in retaining Metcalf, but Henderson adds the team weighed the WR’s unhappiness with what it would take to extend him for a second time.
The Texans already have Nico Collins on a big-ticket extension; his $24MM-per-year price — which matches Metcalf’s previous AAV — now looks like a steal. The Chargers jettisoned their two high-priced WR contracts (Keenan Allen, Mike Williams) weeks into Jim Harbaugh‘s tenure. While the Bolts previously came up as a team to watch for Metcalf, Harbaugh’s outfit has kept costs low at the position. Recommitting to the run game, the Chargers did ultimately reunite with Williams this offseason. Not contributing much after the Steelers added him in a trade, the former top-10 pick is back in L.A. on a one-year deal worth only $3MM.
The Pats have temporarily addressed their receiver situation by signing Stefon Diggs, a perennial Pro Bowler the Texans showed interest in retaining. While Diggs has an extensive production history, he is also a depressed asset due to coming off an ACL tear at 31. New England’s long-term WR search will likely continue, and the Aiyuk and Metcalf storylines show the difficulties the team has had recruiting here post-Tom Brady.
Baby Diva.
Patriots keep getting rejected by WRs lmao
Elite qb’s make up for a lot of issues. But if your choices don’t include an elite qb then the O-line is what you look at for some success. Pats O-line is trash. But if they build the trenches on both sides of the ball then playmakers will start to see it as a destination.
I agree it’s just funny if you think about it. Aiyuk, D Hop, Metkalf, Ridley, and a few others all passed on the patriots lol
Worked out for the Pats. He’s not worth 33 million a year and a second rounder. He got the bag he wanted and will now be catching passes from Mason Rudolph or some other mediocre QB.
Lol yes he is.
Thank F’ing god. Pats have have been saved from themselves on multiple occasions on these bloated wr contracts or trades. Let him rot in Pittsburg. He sure as hell isn’t going to live up to it…
What states have a Pittsburg?
AI Overview
The following states have cities or towns named “Pittsburg”: California, Florida, Kansas, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Texas, and Tennessee (South Pittsburg).
Here’s a more detailed breakdown:
California: Pittsburg
Florida: Pittsburg
Kansas: Pittsburg
New Hampshire: Pittsburg
Oklahoma: Pittsburg
Texas: Pittsburg
Tennessee: South Pittsburg
Generative AI is experimental. Learn more
Pittsburg – Wikipedia
United States * Pittsburg, California. * Pittsburg, Florida. * Pittsburg, Kansas, Crawford County. * Pittsburg, New Hampshire. * Pittsburg, Oklahoma. * Pittsbu…
So he’d rather go to a team with Rudolph as the quarterback instead of the 3rd pick in the draft that showed promise
You have to wonder why so many WRs seem to want no part of New England.
Clearly they know something we don’t.
I’d hate to be catching footballs in New England in winter. There’s winter games every year.
How exactly is Pittsburg any different then New England weather?
It’s PITTSBURGH not Pittsburg. Are you an American?
One of the best moves made by the Hawks GM by getting rid of this walking time bomb.
This has to be one of the reasons players don’t want to go there. “In New England, Massachusetts has a “millionaire tax” that adds a 4% surcharge on income exceeding $1 million”