The edge rusher market lost Haason Reddick, who is finally on track to make his Jets debut thanks to a recent contract resolution. As teams are in need at the glamour defensive position, inquiries into two of the league’s best are already underway.
Although the Raiders have said they are not trading Maxx Crosby, the standout EDGE subsequently made some comments that could pry that door open. Crosby is tied to a 2-5 team. Myles Garrett has that beat, with the Browns having gone from an 11-6 season to starting 1-6. Garrett is signed through 2026, and teams are looking into the 2023 Defensive Player of the Year.
Teams have begun asking the Browns if Garrett could be obtained in a trade, Sports Illustrated’s Albert Breer notes. Clubs certainly ask on players they do not expect to be made available, but cleveland.com’s Mary Kay Cabot reports the Browns will not trade their centerpiece defender. Rumors swirled about Garrett’s potential availability last week, as the Browns did part with Amari Cooper, but Garrett has said he wants to finish his career in Cleveland. As it stands, the All-Pro defensive end does not need to worry about relocating.
Cleveland has Garrett tied to an extension that runs through 2026. The Browns did well to lock down the ascending defender on a five-year deal shortly after exercising his fifth-year option. That meant Garrett was under team control for seven more years. We are now in Year 5, and Garrett — who at the time was coming off his suspension stemming from the ugly incident that involved him striking Mason Rudolph with a helmet — has become one of the best players in Browns history. He is in the running for best player since the team rebooted — though, Joe Thomas probably holds that distinction currently — and rumblings about a second extension figure to emerge in 2025.
Garrett’s team-friendly contract would naturally appeal to suitors, but it also would make the price of acquiring him steep. The Browns would be out more than $40MM in dead money by trading Garrett now. Most of that sum could be defrayed to 2025, but the Browns are not exactly in a situation where taking on major dead money amounts will be palatable — given their quarterback situation.
A first-round pick and change would presumably be required for the Browns to consider moving on, as this is not a typical rebuild situation. Garrett still anchors a quality defense, one that led the league against the pass last season and helped it survive a slew of offensive injuries during a playoff campaign, and the Browns have a host of strong role players. Though, their QB plan has effectively overshadowed everything else about the roster.
The Browns have made the playoffs twice under Kevin Stefanski, whose two Coach of the Year showings came after he coached Baker Mayfield and Joe Flacco to bounce-back seasons. Deshaun Watson‘s contract and woeful performance has hindered the Browns, and the fourth-year HC is not yet committing to the embattled passer for the 2025 season. Still, the Browns are tied to Watson’s fully guaranteed deal. Although Cabot notes the Browns are likely to trade more players before the deadline, Garrett and Denzel Ward are not likely to be among them.
Both Garrett and Ward, the latter a Cleveland-area native, should be considered building blocks for when the franchise picks up the pieces from the Watson disaster. Ward is signed through 2027 on what had been — before the Patrick Surtain and Jalen Ramsey deals — a top-market cornerback contract. A John Dorsey-era draftee, Ward was nevertheless a priority under current FO boss Andrew Berry, who was on the Browns’ staff under Sashi Brown when the team drafted Garrett in 2017.
It would surprise if the Browns parted with either of their top two defenders, with Breer adding recently extended linebacker Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah is unlikely to be dealt. Za’Darius Smith made the unusual step of mentioning a potential Lions trade, and Detroit is believed to be interested.
The Browns will likely be OK dealing some veterans, as they formulate a post-2024 plan as this year’s team almost definitely will not return to the playoffs. Garrett and Ward are undoubtedly part of that 2025-and-beyond vision.
I would trade Ward, but keep Myles. Ward has had a bunch of concussions and DBs decline much quicker than defensive ends. A corner could be top of the league and then burnt toast a few years later. I’d trade pretty much anyone not named Myles, Chubb, or JOK.
Ward would have very limited trade value given the factors you just mentioned and the money on his deal, to the point where it makes no sense to trade him at all.
He’d have way more value to the Browns than anything he could possibly bring back in a trade.
Any team in contention with an established QB would probably give a 1st rounder to acquire Myles Garrett if the Browns were selling. That’s not their plan but maybe it should be, and they could draft their next QB, instead of sticking to the plan, since their plans usually crash and burn, although that seems to always happen every time they draft a QB as well. I’m just glad I’m not a Browns fan.
They might trade Garrett, but they’d have to wait to see where teams stack in the draft before they do. They’re not going to make a move mid-season. Yeah, the Browns have taken the QB ugly stick from the Broncos for sure.
My falcons need to sign Crosby and garrett deserves way better. He should go to Texans or bills
STAGP with the “trade Garrett/Crosby” bit! No one is trading an under 30 blue chip player at a premium position for anything less than three first round picks. And that’s not going to happen.