10:00pm: While an Aiyuk-to-Pittsburgh remains in play, it sounds like a trade hasn’t been completed because the 49ers believe they can convince the wideout to stick in San Francisco. Per NFL Network’s Mike Garafolo, the 49ers and Aiyuk’s camp aren’t “that far apart on a deal.” The reporter notes that the 49ers have improved their offer in recent days, and it “has always” been the player’s preference to stick with San Francisco.
12:50pm: Brandon Aiyuk may still find his way to Pittsburgh, but the possibility of a long-term San Francisco deal also exists. A trade agreement has been worked out between the teams, Ian Rapoport of NFL Network reports.
Rapoport adds that the Steelers are “in a good place” with respect to an extension for the All-Pro wideout. The 49ers also have a standing offer to Aiyuk which would allow him to stay in the Bay Area for 2024 and beyond, however. That offer has not yet been accepted.
As the waiting game continues, Aiyuk will have the option of choosing to take a multi-year 49ers deal or, failing that, the 49ers will be in position to authorize the trade. Terms on an extension will be critical, of course. The Steelers have not yet been willing to reach $30MM per season on a deal; that has also been the case for San Francisco. Whereas trade terms had not yet been sufficient from the 49ers’ perspective, though, today’s update points to a Steelers acquisition once again being a distinct possibility.
Rapoport’s report does not specify what Pittsburgh has offered, but the package set to head to the Bay Area will no doubt be noteworthy. Gerry Dulac of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette repeats his previous reporting, though, that no Steelers players are involved. Both the Patriots and Browns had deals worked out, and those agreements would have sent Aiyuk to a new team. The 26-year-old nixed a reported deal which would have yielded Amari Cooper and a pair of draft picks for the Niners, given his preference not to play in Cleveland or New England. Pittsburgh has long been known to be a destination Aiyuk is interested in.
As the Athletic’s Dianna Russini confirms, the Steelers have been waiting on the trade front for days. Pittsburgh does not have a veteran receiver to offer in a trade (at least, not one of Cooper’s caliber). George Pickens is the centerpiece of the team’s passing attack as it currently stands, with Diontae Johnson having been traded away this spring. That move – coupled with the release of Allen Robinson – has led to speculation the Steelers could add a receiver, and an Aiyuk acquisition would certainly mark a major move for their offense.
Late last month, general manager Omar Khan said no deals at the receiver position were being explored. Interest in Aiyuk has erupted since then, with the former first-rounder’s trade request not sparking progress on a 49ers extension agreement. Aiyuk has long been tied to an asking price around $30MM per year, a mark four receivers are currently attached to. It will be interesting to see if San Francisco’s most recent offer reaches that point, or if the Steelers are prepared to up their latest one to get a trade over the finish line.
As the Jets’ situation with Haason Reddick proves, working out a trade without a firm extension in place can be highly problematic for the acquiring team. One year remains on Aiyuk’s rookie deal, and he is due $14.12MM in 2024 on the fifth-year option. A long-term deal will no doubt be worth roughly double that figure, perhaps more. Which team he plays on during his next pact remains to be seen, however.
Yeah Rapoport’s never misled any one before….
If Brandon Can play Qb…he can throw to himself…that would be exciting
We had Pickett last season. And Trubisky. And Duck Hodges. And Rudolph. And the last two seasons of Roethlisberger. And this is what you keep coming with?
Wilson is a supreme upgrade to all of that. I’ll be reminding you. To me, the jury is out on Fields but even he is better than the aforementioned
They also have Arthur Smith as OC. He had Pitts Bijan & London yet went to Algier in the red zone.
Point being: Aiyuk has apparently pouted his way into a career black hole … well deserved imo
Again, having endured the true “black hole” of watching Pickett and Trubisky, Mason and Duck and the last couple of years of an immobilized Ben, and having endured the Matt Canada Oblivion Express, why don’t we just wait to see what Smith and Wilson bring before making such pronouncements?
I’m betting it’s a million times better and that Aiyuk and Pickens make it pretty formidable
Looks like rudolph might start for Tennessee.
The Steelers screwed Rudolph from the start
It’s his history not my subjective opinion.
If there’s one player to benefit from Smith it’s Warren but DC’s already have a playbook on Smith: don’t ease up on covering receivers to stack the box.
Ask any ATL fan
Wilson a upgrade is a stretch. Fields is a better choice.
Another thread about this? Great…
at least this is an actual update. framework of a trade in place. sure beats the daily “Aiyuk situation still uncertain” article
“Brandon Aiyuk Situation is Insane”
Who is forcing you to read the articles?
You know, you don’t have to read it right? If you’re “so tired of it”, you can just ignore it
Since athletes pay income tax based on the city they play their game in, for every $1 he earns during games in Pittsburgh he would need to earn about $1.70 in San Francisco. So if you figure 10 games considering a potential playoff game, $10 in Pittsburgh would cost him $17 in San Fran. This could be why he might take less in Pittsburgh.
The most infamous story for this is when Jose Reyes took less money to play for Miami because there is no state income tax in Florida and then after 1 season got traded to Toronto where Canadas top fed tax rate is 57% and USA was 37%. He took less money to play in Florida and then immediately took a 20% pay cut a year later.
It’s not just their home games. They don’t get charged income tax in a different state for playing a road game. All of the tax is based on the state of primary employment which would be their home team.
That is not true. You “earn” the money where you play so you get taxed by the rates of that area. A Steeler playing a road game at SF pays the California rate and vice versa
I think your math is way off. State of PA income tax is 3.07%. Non-PA residents who work in Pittsburgh pay 1%. So for every $1 he earns, he takes home about $0.96 (not including Federal, obviously).
State of CA income tax maxes at 12.3% plus an additional 1% over $1 million income. City of Santa Clara doesn’t have a city tax. So in order to hit $0.96 of income, he would need to earn about $1.11 (1.11 minus 13.3% = ~$0.96).
Still a sizeable difference of about 11%, but nowhere near $1.70 vs $1.
If anyone athlete complains about taxes, I will scream! No athlete pays more as in a percentage of income tax than many Canadians making far less money!
I don’t think any of them are complaining about it but it definitely figures into contracts since it can affect net pay pretty significantly at those dollar amounts
Well the reason they make far less is because they are receiving “free” Healthcare and other benefits that Americans don’t ,so it kinda evens out imho.
free health care in Canada and most other countries…so more income tax… more tax on gas , beer etc…
You should have stayed awake during math clasd
And you, English class lmfao…im sorry, I had to get you on that one.
FWIW, Pittsburgh has a special tax on pro athletes.
But, I believe it’s only for visiting players. And I think it’s being challenged in court.
………..70%?
for every $1 he earns during games in Pittsburgh he would need to earn about $1.70 in San Francisco.
=================
I’m curious about the numbers. I just looked quickly, but CA + SF tax is ~ 20.4%. PA + PT is ~ 6%.
So if you earned $1.70 in SF, you keep (ignoring FIT) $1.35. If you earned $1.70 in PT, you get to keep $1.60.
Or conversely, if you earned $1 in PT, you keep $0.94. To keep $0.94 if SF, you would need to earn $1.18.
I see no way you can go from $1.00 to $1.70.
And if you are worried about taxes on 26 million or 28 million a year, you are probably not very responsible with your money and need some life changes. Taxes are a very weak argument.
Yes, agreed. And let’s face it. If Aiyuk wanted to live here he could likely buy 5 houses for the cost of 1 in California.
Sorry, Joe. Didn’t see your post before I did the math above. Also I don’t think (and could definitely be wrong) Aiyuk is subjected to SF taxes because they play in Santa Clara. My math was $1.11 to every $1.00 made in Pittsburgh, a far cry from $1.70.
My numbers weren’t meant to be overly precise. It just figured that 70% appeared to be way, way off. I’ve always said the secret to good math is to be able to look at your numbers to see whether they seem reasonable. 70% because of a difference in state tax should’ve looked wrong to the writer.
It’s all coming together.
I’d be willing to bet Aiyuk stays in SF.
Why leave over what amounts to pennies at this level? Moving across the country to a cold-weather city and not knowing who will be throwing you the ball in a year seems like a risky proposition (at least for the next potential contract). .
I don’t disagree with what you are saying…. But why hasn’t he re-signed yet?
That’s what the whole issue is about if your talking about Aiyuk. He’s in his final year of rookie contract (5th year-team optional) and so he wants to be signed to a multi-year extension and paid like the higher tier WRs who are making 30M a year and playing just as well as he is. 9ers aren’t willing to go that high but they r supposedly close and if he won’t compromise then the steelers have a deal set up supposedly.
I agree. At least with Patriots and Browns u would know who is throwing to you and the type of offensive team you would be going to yet he has some kinda hard-on for Pukeburgh. I don’t get wanting a trade from a top tier team to a team that barely made the playoffs and have an ominous qb situation to deal with…welp it is what it is. I get using a trade for pressure but for what I said earlier…it doesn’t make sense to me but then again, I’m not the pro in his situation.
«And the cooperations get all cooperationy and they make money..«
Am I the only one who thinks he is definitely not worth that contract? He’s not even the best receiver on his team to be asking for that money. Crazy imo.
Very good receiver. Not great.
Not worth 30 mill, but I’d say the niners are right about his worth of around 26. However, he’s definitely the best receiver on the team. Deebo is a better offensive talent, but not better receiver. CMC might just be a better receiver, but he still plays running back
Don’t trade a first and don’t give him $30 million.
If you can avoid that, go for it, I guess…if you don’t mind gumming up your future cap situations to fill a position you draft better than any other team in the league.
Sorry who drafts better at WR than the entire league? Certainly not Pittsburgh, who’s had a couple years of good WR and that’s it. Tell me Mr draft, who have they drafted that’s better than the rest of the league? They haven’t ever had the best receiver in the league, so I’m a bit confused.
Homer fans smh
You don’t think Antonio Brown was the best wr for a good 3-4 year stretch?
smh
All the Steelers do is draft WRs and LBs successfully.
I’m not even a Steelers fan and would disagree with this. They are very well known for drafting great WRs, especially mid rounds….Emmanuel Sanders, Antonio Brown, Mike Wallace, Santonio Holmes, JuJu, Diontae Johnson, Hines Ward. Just to name a few smh
Braveshomer gave you a (partial) list. Pickens is pretty good, too. And those are just the mid round picks. Not counting firsts like Plex.
Which team drafts WR better?
Bleach your bathrooms this move would bring Big Ben back!
If he stays he is just going to look like the biggest attention who**, this is probably one of the only times he will be talked about this much.
Wow.. contender to an absolute pretender… for a few dollars more…
Trying to think of a situation like this where a trade is agreed upon and in place – publicly, yet the trading team still looking to sign the player. I’m sure it happens often behind closed doors, but can’t recall one publicly out there like this.
Yeah if Steelers want him, Khan should give SF a deadline to say either yay or nah
I’ve begun to think that Aiyuk manipulated all of this to force the Niners’ hand. Likely he never wanted to play anyplace else.
A genius at negotiations in this era
Will surprise me now if they trade him
49ers forced to show Aiyuk the reality of where he is going and what they will pay him there. $26 million in San Francisco is starting to look awfully sweet. Good chance to win a Super Bowl. In Pittsburgh a great opportunity for a career-ending injury in a November snow bowl before missing the playoffs.
Hmmmm
Swann. Stallworth. Lipps. AB. Hines.
Can’t remember any of those guys getting hurt in the snow
But ok. Solid point
please, come to the burg
pittsburghs a much better place than san fran
him and pickens and roman wilson
IMO Lamb is better, and Pittsburgh could have given Dallas an offer they can’t refuse.
A lot of WR would be better if they got 181 targets.
Pittsburgh a much better place than san fran?
You got to stop reading Facebook and X posts.
SF is a beautiful city. It’s likely 3-4 times bigger than our city. However, while I get your comment, it’s unfortunate that Pittsburgh still has the image of “steel city” with smoke billowing mills and a populace of mainly blue collar working stiffs.
Not sure what you mean by “X posts”—who even goes there anymore—but Pittsburgh is a beautiful, viable small city with something for everyone
Now if you’ll forgive me, I’m going to apply for work at the Visitors Bureau
SF is a cess pool. Nothing but homeless, LGBT, and high rent there. It’s truly an awful city.
It’s a good thing the 49ers reside in Santa Clara.
Santa Clara no different. Cess pool. Outrageous rent. Ton of homeless and gays. Awful politics. Outrageous cost of goods. Just an overall piss poor state California is.
Aiyuk has played this very well. Either way this breaks he gets what he wanted.
Lol oh how in 10 hours it flip flopped 17 times
Still not sure why the 49ers are still playing this game – as its a lose-lose situation for them. Just pay him the $14 million left on his rookie deal this year and then put a non-exclusive franchise tag on him next off-season.
Reports out of San Francisco is that the 49ers will sign him. Looks like steeler deal is dead
Yeah, this entire situation began to take on an aroma that wasn’t too sweet
Yep, he returned to practice in a limited role yesterday and the rumor today is that it’s just years and guaranteed money are the 2 hurdles to get through. Niners matched the 28 million a year Pittsburgh offered.
I read the SF local reporting yesterday. Yeah, he was there but didn’t participate. Talked with Lynch and a number of players
Agree with Madden’s column today. There’s a fine line between going for it trade-wise and being played. Time for the Steelers to put a deadline on it and move on
I don’t think a deadline is necessary at this point. I think a trade is 95% dead.