A number of contract-related disputes are ongoing around the league, many of which affect the receiver position. In the case of the Broncos and Courtland Sutton, no resolution is imminent.
The former Pro Bowler confirmed earlier this month that he and the team are at a standstill with respect to negotiations on a new pact. Two years remain on Sutton’s contract, with $2MM of his 2024 base salary guaranteed. He is open to an adjustment to the deal consisting of new compensation – as opposed to an extension – but it remains to be seen if the Broncos will accommodate that wish.
Sutton skipped OTAs while recovering from offseason ankle surgery, and he gave thought to remaining away from the team during minicamp. Instead, the 28-year-old took part in the mandatory event while noting progress still needs to be made on the contract front. With that remaining the case, he could be absent once training camp opens later this month.
When asked if he will hold out in the absence of a new agreement, the former second-rounder replied, via The Athletic’s Nick Kosmider, “We’ll see” (subscription required). Players have stayed away from teams during training camp on plenty of occasions before, although more recently the ‘hold-in’ approach has become common. The latter avenue consists of players attending camp but not taking part in any on-field work.
Being attached to a non-rookie pact, Sutton would be subject to mandatory daily fines if he elected to skip training camp. The SMU product helped his bargaining position with a career-high 10 touchdown catches in 2023, and the Broncos’ decision to trade away Jerry Jeudy left Sutton in place as an experienced receiving option for a new-look QB room. On the other hand, Sutton has just one season on his resume (2019) with more than 1,000 yards.
The top of the receiver market has reached new heights this offseason, and the likes of Ja’Marr Chase, CeeDee Lamb and Brandon Aiyuk are positioned to land monster extensions from their respective teams. Sutton is not in an identical position given his age and production, but his situation is still one to monitor closely as training camp approaches. It will be interesting to see if traction is gained with respect to negotiations given the possibility of a holdout.
These guys are getting BOLD. Zero time first team all pro, zero time second team all pro, ONE time pro bowl for hitting 1100 yards and 6 TDs only, and he is going to hold out?
He’s been holding out on his potential his entire career at this point.
Well, while in a vacuum, Sutton may have a weak bargaining position, the Broncos did not do themselves any favors when they turned down trade offers for him during the draft, after he had skipped the voluntary off-season workouts. Per that article and I would agree, it shows that the team wants to keep him to some extent. So, if the Broncos balk at his demands, he could respond by saying “then trade me”.
I agree with that for sure.
See JJ.
I suspect, partially facetiously, that that’s part of the reason that Denver is balking, actually. They could probably get a deal done with just a few more guarantees, but it would be much easier to swing an in season, before-the-deadline type trade with a guy who’s only guaranteed a few million…
I’d like to see the Steelers get DK Metcalf but…I suspect they end up with this guy.
honor what you (already) signed Schmuck.
get yo’ arse on the field. produce. (then) we give you BANK
The teams don’t have to honor contracts unless there is specific language for guaranteed money. This remains the worst argument.
You can’t hold out effectively if you don’t have any leverage. See LeVeon Bell
(every) one -is- replaceable.