OCTOBER 25: At least one offer has come in for Sweat, according to Jhabvala, but no known proposals have arrived for Young. The Commanders had viewed Weeks 7 and 8 as critical for their deadline plans, per ESPN.com’s Jeremy Fowler, who adds the team has given the impression it wants to retain Young despite his lack of a contract beyond this season. The 3-4 team losing to the favored Eagles could end up swaying the organization’s trade plans before the Halloween deadline. As of now, however, the Sweat-Young duo remains in place.
OCTOBER 24: As the trade deadline approaches, one of the key questions surrounding the Commanders is how they will proceed with Chase Young and Montez Sweat. Both edge rushers are due for a new contract in the offseason, and their names have come up in trade speculation.
Washington is not actively looking to move either player, but reports have indicated offers will be considered if they check in near the team’s (as of yet unknown) asking price. Of course, that would require sufficient interest on the part of other teams which would be willing to not only pay a notable price in draft capital in a trade, but also make a long-term financial commitment.
On that point, CBS Sports’ Josina Anderson reports that “several identifiable teams” are prepared to pull off a trade for Young or Sweat and retain them via a long-term deal. Both former first-rounders have been full-time starters during their time in the nation’s capital, though Young’s tenure has been underwhelming in large part due to injuries. The former No. 2 pick has suited up for five games this year, however, and racked up five sacks and 18 QB pressures to date. Those figures have him on track to surpass his production from his Defensive Rookie of the Year campaign in 2020.
Sweat, meanwhile, has put up nearly identical stats this year (5.5 sacks, 17 pressures) while remaining a key component of Washington’s defensive front. That unit already has two major commitments, of course, in the form of defensive tackles Jonathan Allen and Daron Payne. Young and Sweat will each need lucrative second contracts starting in 2024; the former had his fifth-year option declined in the spring, while the latter is playing out his option this year ($11.5MM).
Many expect the Commanders to simply retain both Young and Sweat through the deadline and attempt to re-sign at least one of them ahead of free agency. As Sam Fortier and Nicki Jhabvala of the Washington Post note, outside executives don’t foresee teams preparing much of a trade offer for either player given their status as a rental. Deadline deals often seen aging veterans moved to contenders for a postseason run, but an exception amongst pass rushers emerged last year when the Broncos dealt Bradley Chubb to the Dolphins for a haul including a first-round pick.
That deal was immediately followed by Chubb inking a five-year, $110MM deal in Miami, making his acquisition a long-term investment. It will be interesting to see if a team demonstrates a willingness to pull off a similar trade-and-sign arrangement in the case of Young and/or Sweat in the coming days.
Probably worth a compensatory pick if they lose them in free agency – thus someone’s going to need to offer a 3rd round pick or better.
Broncos dealt Chubb to the Broncos. Way to proof read.
Broncos dealt Chubb to themselves. Makes sense.
“Broncos dealt Bradley Chubb to the Broncos for a haul including a first-round pick”.
I wish the Bears could work some magic like that…lol
3 of 4 1st round draft picks under Ron went on the D side. Young, J Davis, & Forbes. Dotson is the only O player selected by him. That is at best, an average D, coached by a supposedly D minded HC. Time for Ron to go.
There’s bound to be sweeping changes in DC now that new ownership is in place. Do Young & Chase have as much value in a team rebuild as they would as trade chips? I guess we’ll find out at the deadline.
It’s the old– new HC/GM saying ‘we didn’t draft them…’ speech. So may as well give them draft capital. And they shouldn’t replace the QB. No reason to try and win more games this year. ‘Take a long look at Howell’ speech.
Howell – yeah, I mean why not give him more of a chance? While he has his issues, he still could develop into a decent, above-average QB and if he does, you’ve got yourself a serviceable QB for only a 5th round pick. Their season certainly isn’t going anywhere.
They need serious upgrades on Oline, but I agree he looks decent.
Seems like a very simplistic system they run on the D side that opponents clearly know how to attack.
I think neither will be traded to allow them to audition for whomever the coach is next season, which at this point seems inevitable.
When they brought in Eric B to run the O, that was a sign of having ‘an interim HC’ on the staff. That’s how I saw it.
Not sure why you saw it that way.
I saw it that way because everyone knew Dan was selling. My thought process was the new owner would want his handpicked GM, HC, QB combo; not leftovers from Dan. He’s been very clear he wants to clean house and get rid of the Dan funk that’s been there for 20 years. Going so far as to say the name most likely will be changed again.
So by bringing in a vet coordinator that has interviewed for jobs, he would have a replacement on the staff. I also believe that’s why they never & still haven’t wavered young 5th round QB with 1 pro game under his belt, rather than play Jacoby whose been in the league for sometime and would probably generate more wins than Howell.
And the last point, Magic has been very vocal about how disappointed this season has gone. There will be a coaching change soon.
It’s a tank season w/o calling it that. They want a high draft pick.
I think Howell earned the starting job between sitting and learning last season combined with out playing Brisset in pre-season. I would have wondered the same had Howell stumbled in pre-season, but it was Brisset that looked like a back up. Benching Howell now does nothing other than hinder his development. In Brisset you already know what you got.
Howell looks pretty decent considering the Oline he’s playing with. It seems like its always multiple defenders getting into the backfield.
According to NFL.com, If the season ended today, Washington picks 12th. That’s not high enough for QB but is for LT.
Good take. It’s hard to tell much about Howell behind that O-line. But there’s also a reason he was a 5th round pick.
2 reasons – The talent around him regressed in his junior year from the previous season from the guys that left, putting him in a similar predicament he is in now. His passing yards declined slightly, but rushed for 800 yards/11rush TD’s.
Then had a bad showing in senior bowl, – the other team D line was blowing up the line he played behind and ended up doing a lot of scrambling.
Howell had more TD’s, less Ints in 3 seasons in college than Brock Purdy did in 4 seasons who was a 7th round pick.
Do you think Howell will be the starter next season? Or Ron will be the HC? I’m 100% comfortable saying I don’t to both.
Howell will definitely be on the team due to being on a cheap 5th round rookie deal. There will very likely be a new HC due to Ron’s track record up until now combined with new ownership group. I could see a new HC declaring a QB competition in the off-season. It would take a huge regression for Howell to not at least be considered. Barring that I think yes he will be.
Next year he’ll be in season 3. Is a 3rd year Sam Howell a better choice on opening day or a rookie starting his first NFL game?
2024 is a QB rich draft, but I doubt Washington will have a top 5 pick, meaning they’ll miss out on the top 3. Resources would be better spent on Oline.
Sure, 2024 MAY BE a QB rich draft but just look at history, where, on average, the success of a 1st round QB is right 50%. That’s huge draft capital for a ‘yay or ‘nay’ result. Are there any other positions with better success rates? Hard to tell with grading some but if you get an OL wrong that’s hurts less than if you get a QB wrong in the first. Maybe you get lucky and get that Joe Thomas to protect your 5th round investment for a decade??
That’s why I say OL would be better investment. Build a team around Howell. They got good players on D and good receivers.
I think Washington’s D finishing 2nd or 3rd in yardage allowed 2 of the last 3 years says different. Facts matter.
Everywhere I read, they have a bottom 20 D. One example. Need more; let me know. Ranked 29th by Fox & around there for every other major sports site. Another fact that matters, Ron is well below 500 while in DC.
link to foxsports.com
They allow 33 points per game and are 26th in yards per play.
They allowed an 0-4 team put up 40 on them at home.
They allowed a 1-4 team beat them with a backup QB.
The last 2 seasons the overall average at seasons end is pretty high because they get it together late in the season. Problem is by then they’re 1 or 2 losses from playoff elimination.
Ron is clearly liked by players and a lot of fans, but between him and Del Rio, two seasoned D coaches, the D shouldn’t take 8 or 10 games every year to figure it out.
Hearing that the Lions may trade for Sweat and Kendall Fuller for a conditional 3rd and 6th. That would be awesome!
Where did you hear that?
You need a DE?? NO SWEAT!!
If we weren’t sure if people read these articles closely, well, we do now!
I’m probably too cynical but I often suspect these fumbles (or supplying the wrong player links) aren’t entirely accidental. It’s a pretty clever way for the staff to monitor who is paying attention (and that information can be used to boost advertising rates).
Yeah, I can see that. However, the staff doesn’t seem to read the comments as closely as the original mis-statement is still in place.