The Giants’ Leonard Williams trade has provided a fairly clear signal the Giants are fine building for the future. After their surprise surge to the 2022 divisional round, the Giants sit 2-6 and not in position to contend this season.
Saquon Barkley has said he does not want to be traded, and Brian Daboll attempted to squash trade overtures last week by saying a deal was “not happening.” But teams are still checking in. Clubs have continued to contact the Giants on Barkley, Jeff Howe of The Athletic tweets. Once again, the Giants rebuffed inquiries, with CBS Sports’ Josina Anderson confirming teams have received no’s on Barkley inquiries.
With just less than 24 hours until the trade deadline, teams’ interest certainly makes sense — especially now that the Giants moved Williams to the Seahawks. Injuries on offense have driven the Giants to this 2-6 hole, with Sunday’s Jets loss featuring the fewest team passing yards — minus-9 — in the NFL this century. Barkley still displayed quality work, putting together a 36-carry, 128-yard performance despite the team refusing to allow UDFA Tommy DeVito to throw. Barkley, 26, suffered a high ankle sprain in Week 2; Sunday provided a decent refresher that the franchise-tagged back is once again healthy.
With the Giants having played eight games, an acquiring team would be on the hook for nine weeks of Barkley’s $10.1MM salary. That works out to just more than $5.5MM. The Giants are paying most of the remaining $10MM on Williams’ salary, but seeing as the team is keeping Barkley off the market, it would stand to reason it is not exactly open to paying some of the Pro Bowl back’s salary to facilitate a trade. Seeing as Barkley is on the tag, however, he does remain an interesting piece that teams clearly are not giving up on potentially obtaining.
The Giants and Barkley could not come to terms on a summer extension, despite negotiations having begun in November 2022. Barkley, who was dangled in trades during the 2022 offseason, was six minutes from free agency at the March deadline to apply franchise tags. But the Giants reaching an extension agreement with Daniel Jones prevented the more talented player from testing the market. The sides then engaged in an unusual negotiation leading up to the July 17 extension deadline for tagged players. The Giants upped Barkley’s guarantees to the $22MM neighborhood but reduced his AAV number in the process. In the end, the sides were less than $2MM apart in terms of guaranteed money and AAV. No deal transpired, opening the door to a Barkley 2024 departure.
While Barkley was obviously interested in gauging his worth in free agency, he has repeatedly said he wants to stay with the Giants. The team will have the option of tagging the former No. 2 overall pick once again, at just more than $12MM, next year. Keeping Barkley past this year’s deadline will keep that option open for the Giants, though considering they extended Jones, Dexter Lawrence and Andrew Thomas and tagged Barkley, it is worth wondering if the New Jersey native is a core piece any longer.
Teams are seeing if that remains the case. The Ravens and Dolphins are believed to be looking into running back additions. Miami asked about Barkley this summer, but it did not appear the teams discussed him for long. With the Titans either committed to keeping Derrick Henry or holding out hope for a big offer, teams are looking into Barkley. As of Monday afternoon, the Penn State alum is being kept off the market.
What do you get when you sign a Daniel Jones to $40M/Yr?
You get what you fracking deserve
What move would you have done instead for QB?
If I’m spending $40M it’s not on a Daniel Jones. Negotiations are a game of chicken and NYG had their eyes closed , opened them and immediately blinked
How else to explain being oblivious to no other team paying him that amount of money; they outbid themselves.
Waller was the only Offensive upgrade but paying a Jones that kind of money with no other pass catchers makes me wonder if they had visions of Brady-Gronk or Mahomes/Kelce (aka: delusional pipe dreams)
They committed a significant amount to a QB who has never shown a glimmer of that value while there are legit potential franchise QBs coming in the next two drafts.
I could go on and on but I’ll never be convinced he was a hilariously ridiculous investment of $40M
You never answered his question.
Mayfield, Minshew, Stidham …
none of which would financially hobble your franchise from addressing all the other gaping holes on both sides of the ball
Minshew is great as a supersub, not so great as a QB1. Stidham has Patriots baggage which the Giants neither want nor need.
NYG don’t need a great QB.
A great QB is a $40M/Y
Daniel Jones is not a great QB
That money should have been much better spent split on several positions instead of paying great QB money to a competent QB
That’s the drum I’ve been beating since it was announced
You miss his point. The point is you sign those clowns to 9pm year deals and your not saddled with this jerk for 49 kill for 2 more years
And exactly who would have played QB in a high dollar NFL QB world these days for the Giants…Brian friggin Hoyer? While Jones contract does look very bad, which QB’s were available that would have cost less and played out of their shoes better?…..waiting….waiting…..waiting….
A real assessment would have been a good start. He threw 15 TD’s last, not even 1 a game. Buckaroo is right.
Draft someone new, or get Baker for $5m. $35m cheaper. Lots of options.
You guys act like it was so simple. Daniel Jones was coming off a solid year, maybe not statistic wise but definitely results wise. Buckaroo has no idea what other teams were going to offer him, he was hit with the Franchise Tag before anyone could find out. Would it have been 40 million? Doubtful, but many around the league thought he could come in between 30-35 million. 5 over is hardly an overpay. It’s a short term deal and the saying is there is no such thing as a bad short term deal. He’s basically guaranteed two years then they can get rid of him. Daboll thought Daniel could take another step this season and so far he hasn’t. It happens. You guys talk about the other holes they could have filled. You mean the ones they haven’t been able to address the 4 seasons prior to Daniel becoming a FA? Tell me what Pro Bowl WR he’s had to throw to the entire time he’s been there? The OL has sucked ice during that time period too. So tell me what faith any of you had that they were going to fix that this offseason. How many times have we seen big time FA sign and produce for their new team? The good teams build through the draft. Signing Daniel Jones to the contract they did had NO effect on their ability to field a better team, their subpar drafting did…
What Pro Bowl WRs do most teams have? Jones isn’t in the same sport as Mahomes so I won’t make that comparison.
No matter how they turned out this season, WRs like Juju, Hardman were upgrades at the time but they sunk so much money into Jones it was moot
OL is definitely where even the slightest upgrade or downgrade makes an immediate difference; check Purdy’s performance without Williams for the perfect example.
To your point, form the last handful of drafts, while other teams were using high picks on OL, they’re drafting WRs with the justification of giving Jones “weapons” instead of “protection”
They made the hilariously inept decision to literally bank the next couple of years on Jones … who, to jog the memory, signed for $40 because $30 was insufficient.
Either he’s insane af or knew he had them bent over a chair … I’d better the latter
No legitimate fans who watched Jones play the last few years would have complained about not paying $40mil a year for the guy. If you remember the negotiations, his demands looked insane for a subpar QB. They could have let him walk without a problem and he’d be a backup (if not 3rd string) on some other team.
Yes, all these arm chair GM types right!
Tyrod Taylor and suck for Caleb! They were foolish to think they could compete with that roster. Last year was fool’s gold.
Surprise if they move off him. Teams that would make sense to inquire are ravens Bucs Vikings and maybe cardinals
Time to strike is now…..you’re right….there is always someone who looks at a piece of coal and sees a diamond in the rough…..come on G-Men….trade Jones now…..be inventive so that we’re positioned for a significantly good 24 draft…..the season is lost….get set up for a good draft and pick a new QB for us to root for……
Not happening
No reason to resign him long term therefore trade him before he gets hurt again.
Do Barkley a good and trade him some place where he can flourish and get a great return for him to position the 24 draft to be a great success……
Your only trading Barkley to a top 10 team so the pick will be a late second rounder at best no one is trading a 1 for maybe a half season of Glass Barkley