Connected to waiting until next year for a Russell Wilson extension, the Broncos instead are committing long-term to their new franchise quarterback now. The team reached an extension agreement with its recently acquired passer Thursday morning, Adam Schefter of ESPN.com reports (on Twitter).
Wilson is signing a five-year, $245MM deal that includes a whopping $165MM guaranteed. Despite his two Seahawks extensions coming ahead of his contract years, Wilson is committing with two years remaining on his previous deal. He is now signed through the 2028 season.
Earlier this summer, second-year Broncos GM George Paton did not indicate extension talks were taking place, but NFL.com’s Ian Rapoport tweets the sides had been talking not too long after the blockbuster trade. The sides paused the talks as the Broncos’ sale became finalized this summer, 9News’ Mike Klis adds, noting Wilson agreed to this contract Wednesday night after attending a dinner with many of his new teammates. With the team’s ownership matter finally resolved, Wilson is now locked in through his age-40 season.
The deal will pay Wilson $124MM over the first three years, Troy Renck of Denver7 tweets. Wilson’s 2022 cashflow will spike from $24MM to $57MM, and NFL.com’s Tom Pelissero adds (via Twitter) he will collect $85MM by 2023 — up from $51MM. This three-year payout looks to benefit the Broncos, who will have Wilson tied to nonguaranteed salaries from 2025-28. Of course, Wilson succeeding early on this contract could certainly prompt the sides to renegotiate down the line.
Although the guarantee figure is not believed to be what will be locked in at signing, per Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk (on Twitter), Wilson is now the league’s second-highest-paid QB. This $49MM-per-year deal places the 11th-year veteran behind only Aaron Rodgers for AAV ($50.3MM). It marks a slightly bigger jump from Wilson’s previous pact ($35MM per annum) compared to the raise he received in April 2019, illustrating where the QB market has gone and the Broncos’ desire to have this rather important position solidified.
The Broncos acquired Wilson via one of the top trade packages in NFL history in March, sending the Seahawks two first-rounders and change to land the 33-year-old star. In the time since, Deshaun Watson and Kyler Murray signed monster extensions with their respective teams — respectively worth $46MM and $46.1MM on average. The Broncos also came under new ownership in the time since acquiring Wilson, and Rob Walton being by far the NFL’s richest owner almost certainly came into play here. Wilson’s extension is miles beyond where the Broncos have gone for a player previously. Their previous top QB commitment was five years and $96MM — for Peyton Manning in 2012.
Manning played four years on that deal, but in the years since the all-time great’s retirement, the Broncos saw their inability to land a successor move them well off the competitive plane upon which they resided with Manning. Denver has missed the playoffs for six straight seasons and has not enjoyed a winning year since 2016. The team has started 11 quarterbacks since Super Bowl 50, including a different Week 1 passer from 2017-21 (Trevor Siemian, Case Keenum, Joe Flacco, Drew Lock, Teddy Bridgewater). The Broncos have not ranked in the top 16 in total offense since Manning’s penultimate season (2014), either. This pattern, the trade capital the team sacrificed, the new QB market and Walton’s arrival — after shattering the American sports record with a $4.65 billion bid — all worked in Wilson’s favor.
These factors could also have pushed Wilson to leverage the Broncos for a player-friendly deal that placed him atop the NFL salary hierarchy once again. His total guarantees do not approach Watson’s, but they do surpass Murray’s ($160MM). Murray and Wilson’s extensions are moving the NFL away from the fully guaranteed agreement Watson signed with the Browns. Wilson’s pact also ties him to the Broncos for longer than Watson’s Browns accord or Rodgers’ latest deal with Green Bay.
Unique circumstances surrounded Cleveland’s decision to give Watson $230MM guaranteed at signing — a last-ditch heave to leapfrog NFC South teams in a complex trade derby — and teams are doing their best to make that contract an outlier. The structures of Wilson and Murray’s contracts will play into the Ravens’ Lamar Jackson negotiations. The Bengals and Chargers, who have their respective standout QBs set to become extension-eligible in 2023, will undoubtedly take notice as well.
The Broncos’ commitment, of course, comes before Wilson has played in a game with his new team. The nine-time Pro Bowler sat out the preseason, joining most of the team’s starters under new HC Nathaniel Hackett, and is coming off his first season in which an injury forced him to miss time. Wilson ruptured a tendon in his right middle finger, sidelining him for three games, in October 2021. After not looking himself in the games immediately following his return, Wilson played better down the stretch. The Seahawks still opted to reboot at season’s end, concluding the most promising QB partnership in franchise history. Geno Smith is now in position to start against Wilson in Week 1, beating out Lock for the gig.
Part of the reason the Seahawks moved on after 10 seasons was a leeriness about going through more extension talks with Wilson. His 2015 ($21.9MM per year) and 2019 extensions came after weeks of back-and-forth. That contrasts from the low-key nature of Wilson’s Broncos talks, but Denver is now the franchise paying the new market price. Seattle, after passing on deals for Baker Mayfield and Jimmy Garoppolo, will likely be linked to first-round passers come 2023.
Connected to a possible trade early during the 2021 offseason, Wilson did not include the Broncos on his initial destination list. The Bears, Cowboys, Saints and Raiders were on it. But Denver quietly surfaced as a potential landing spot late last year. And while other teams pursued Wilson this offseason — the Browns, Commanders, Eagles and Panthers, to name four — the two-time Super Bowl starter only ended up waiving his no-trade clause for the Broncos. Wilson has said he wants to play well into his 40s. He will now attempt to craft a memorable second act; the contract parameters are in place for him to do so.
Playing out the final two years of his previous contract? Class act.
Massive overpay for an aging qb who’s past his prime. Broncos will regret this instantly
Look, I hate the Broncos, but there’s no way they regret this instantly. Maybe in 2 years, but not instantly. Also, it sounds like they can dump him in 3 years anyway when he’s a shell of himself.
I hope they throw the ball 50 times a game this year. That’ll make them a worse team than relying on the ground game.
If Wilson doesn’t succumb to the injury bug this season, then not instantly. But if he does, instantly and ever after.
This is a franchise-crippling contract. Everything has to go right for the Broncos to win here. Some people like to play roulette. The Broncos owners/management, evidently like games of chance too.
On the one hand, it’s a lot of guaranteed money for a 33-year old who’s lost a step. On the other hand, it’s $65 million less in guarantees than a guy who didn’t play last season, won’t play most of this season, has two dozen sexual misconduct accusations, and has had two ACL tears.
Must be because Wilson has a rich wife so he can afford to take a little less, while that other guy doesn’t..for some unknown reason…
I think it’s more that the whole Watson situation is an outlier in multiple ways, but Cleveland sure did nuke the market.
Sexual misconduct? Nah bro
Sexual assault.
Fixed it for you.
Broncos love them an old QB.
Broncos love them a good QB – regardless of age
To be fair, they did try 1 or 2 young QB’s between Manning and now Wilson. If any of those had been successful, they probably wouldn’t be loving another old QB now. But I also wouldn’t say Wilson is all that old either.
Hey, two of their last three starting QBs over the age of 33 won Super Bowls for them, so odds are Wilson will win them one. That’s just analytics right there.
That’s just plain stupid. The fact that they struck out on QB’s for 15 years after Elway, and then haven’t been able to do it again since Manning tells you one thing; The Broncos are horrible at picking a QB. Wilson only confirms that.
If you’re responding to my comment, I was obviously joking. But this is also the first aggressive move Paton has made at QB, and I don’t see how you could possibly compare it to any of their QB moves since Manning.
Great move by management. Get out ahead of the Herbert/Allen/Jackson contracts. Paton signed up Sutton and Patrick to WR extensions before the WR market exploded this past off season. When Sutton shines this year with a real QB (Russell), the Sutton deal will look awesome. Gives flexibility to decide what to do with Jeudy after this season – trade Sutton and sign Jerry (not likely imo) – trade Jeudy and keep drafting WRs (most likely imo).
Josh Allen already signed, your probably thinking of Joe Burrows
Burrow
There are many.
Lamar is smiling!
Ravens were already offering Lamar close to this amount he just wants his contract fully guaranteed which isn’t going to happen.
NFL is now entering MLB and NBA territory of bad contracts esp with guaranteed money. While I think RW is worth the risk, looking at guys like Wentz, Goff, etc.. and the QB contracts get bigger and bigger, and now big money for guys in their mid 30s is quite a risk.
Well yeah, if you look at the two worst second contracts for QBs in recent years, the trend looks extra risky. Wilson has a lot better track record for any stretch of his career than those guys. The league is printing money and QB is the most important position in American sports. Not having a franchise QB or having a clear path to getting one is a bigger risk than the contract is. Just ask the Broncos.
Have you seen how much the “Super League” soccer teams in Europe are spending on transfers this summer? That amount dwarfs anything from any sportsball league in Murica.
I laughed out loud at “sportsball.” Thank you.
Paton & Co. must really like what they’re seeing if they’re going full throttle before the season starts.
I know there’s going to be a lot of naysayers, but Paton’s very calculated and highly under-rated. He’s not going to give Wilson that kind of money over cheerleader points.
Wilson’s game is declining rapidly, thus this extension is going to look pretty silly in about two years.
I think after this season it will look pretty bad. He’s always relied on his wheels and now the tires are bald, broncos gonna bronco.
imindless – you are just full of bad takes regardless of the article but at least you live up to your name.
I rarely comment so that’s false. Show me your triggered without saying your triggered
If anyone here plays fantasy football, mark my words- Javonte Williams will be the RB1 this year!
Will age like fine wine
If that wine was barefoot merlot
What kind of employee discount does he get at Walmart stores if he’s voted MVP?
I’m sure knowing Wal-Mart money was buying the team had a large role in him going there!
This is why I’m so happy Eagles didn’t trade for him. Yes, he probably would have been an improvement over Hurts this year (and with the way he has looked the past season and a half I’m not sure that’s true) but I did not want to give up all it would have taken to get him AND have to pay him that kind of money. No thank you.
You act like its your money. Lol
Quality is worth the money. If you’re okay being less than thats you. Everyone is not okay knowing ahead of time that they’re behind going in, I’m certainly not.
I just prefer the team I root for spend the money smartly, and I don’t think paying Wilson is a smart investment. I think he is on the way down pretty rapidly.
I don’t think I’m acting like it’s my money at all. You’re telling me when teams you support give out bad contracts you don’t care because you’re not the one paying it? Gtfo
There’s a lot of first rate offensive lineman in that contract. The offensive linemen would do more to help a middling QB win games than that money will help Russell Wilson survive a season.
It’s an overspend, both in draft picks and in salary cap. LA Rams hitting the jackpot in their first year with Matthew Stafford did nothing to encourage prudence or long term planning. Sean McVay will be safely in a broadcast booth for the five or seven seasons of talent hell the Rams will be in starting from 2024.
LET RUSS COOK, LET RUSS COOK, LET RUSS TANK… oops sorry, didn’t mean for that to slip out he he he
There’s absolutely nothing to say here.
Bad move? Seriously. — THINK!
Just remove Russell Wilson from the Broncos. Good? No!
If you suddenly dropped Wilson on the block as of now he’d just make more.
He’s a major player, a major player who is a QB in the NFL (and he’s not an a-hole he’s actually a pretty f’n cool guy), they’re going to spend a solid amount of money and it won’t be the last team that does it cuz it WORKS!
I don’t want Drew Lock, thanks!
Win or lose I look forward to the season. Let’s ride, play ball, give it a name. From Payton to Paton, “can’t wait”.
One thing though, if I have to watch anymore Shurmur screen passes over and over and over with a guy that can through 20+ I’m done watching football.
Except it doesn’t actually work and that’s been pretty much proven. Out of the last 20 Superbowl winners I believe none of them had a top 5 QB based on salary. There might be 1 or 2 who who have done it but regardless the number clearly show having a top paid QB isn’t the formula for winning a Superbowl. As for your comment of if he was just dropped on the block he would make more…. That’s a weird argument to make considering he is now the 2nd highest paid QB.