Clarence E. Hill, Jr. of the Star-Telegram writes that Cowboys owner Jerry Jones will testify before commissioner Roger Goodell and other owners at an appeal hearing tomorrow in Palm Beach, Florida. Jones is appealing the commissioner’s decision to assess him more than $2MM in legal fees stemming from the federal court case with Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott and Jones’ opposition to Goodell’s contract extension.
As Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk observes, the fact that Jones is testifying before Goodell means that Goodell has not exercised his right to designate the appeal to someone else, even though not doing so creates obvious conflict of interest concerns. In Florio’s estimation, Jones has strong arguments against fee-shifting for his threat to sue the league with respect to Goodell’s extension, as he never actually followed through with the threat. His arguments against fee-shifting with respect to the Elliott matter is a different story, as the Cowboys clearly provided substantial assistance to Elliott in his battle with the league.
Florio says Goodell has final and binding power to resolve the amount of legal fees to be paid, but the resolution granting him that power does not expressly grant him the authority to also answer the threshold question of whether club behavior triggered a repayment obligation. Goodell presumably will take the position that he has final say in that regard, too.
As the Goodell v. Jones saga drags on, let’s take a look at several more notes from the NFC:
- Although the Bears have interest in Dolphins wideout Jarvis Landry, Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune does not believe the team should trade for him. Biggs says Landry does not give Chicago the dynamic, speedy playmaker that it needs, and given that, it would cost too much in both dollars and draft capital to land him.
- Although most mock drafts have the Lions selecting a RB or DE with their first-round draft pick, Michael Rothstein of ESPN.com says the team could target an OLB like Virginia Tech’s Tremaine Edmunds to boost its pass rush. Rothstein says the Lions could indeed target a RB with its first draft choice, but it’s a deep class for RBs, and the better value might be found on Day 2.
- John Keim of ESPN.com says it is unclear whether Redskins team president Bruce Allen is on the hot seat, though Keim believes he should be. Nonetheless, Keim thinks it would take a really bad season, and not just a mediocre one, for Allen to be shown the door.
- Mike Jurecki of 98.7FM says the Cardinals would like to retain linebacker Josh Bynes as a depth option, but he believes the team will target a linebacker at some point in the draft and/or look to the UDFA market to grab an LB (Twitter link).
- Earlier today, we took a look at potential QB plans for the Vikings and Giants.
The Commissioner does not like to be questioned about his authority. So the guy will preside over the hearing in which Jones questioned his contract and his authority? The league does not need this drama! The billion dollar boys club is at again! No wonder they can’t decide what a catch is in a game!!!!
Guess they should’ve negotiated the CBA differently…
It’s funny hearing people complain about Goodell. The owners just gave the guy an extension. He’s not going anywhere.
That’s why the players want to change Goodell’s role in the league, or at least reduce it. He’s basically the judge, jury, and executioner for a lot of the matters in the league. The owners won’t do anything about it because Goodell has been more pro-owners than pro-players.
The players negotiated away the right of Goodell being judge, jury and executioner. And as with all negotiations they got something in exchange for that in the last CBA, so they (and people) shouldn’t be crying about it since then.
Can’t say I agree with Biggs about Landry. The Bears essentially need a whole receiving corps. In that group, you can have more than one kind of receiver and you can come by the best ones any which way possible.
Maybe you get a reliable, chain moving, possession receiver that can help a young QB along (Landry) via trade. Maybe you try and draft the dynamic playmaker by trading down to recoup a lost pick and take Sutton in the teens.
Maybe one of Robinson or Watkins makes it to free agency and the Bears can sign them. Maybe Dez gets cut and the Bears take a flyer on him on a one year “prove it” contract. Maybe Paul Richardson is the best the Bears can do in free agency.
Either way, I think Landry’s a great fit for one of the many holes they have at the WR position, and I don’t think trading for him hinders what they can do elsewhere given how much cap space they have.
They’ve had several guys that fill the short/ medium slots that serve the purpose for far less than Landry. A deep threat is what they’ve been sorely lacking.
He’s arguably the best position receiver in the NFL. Don’t be ridiculous. Yeah, several guys that aren’t half as good.
He’s a good possession receiver, but his contract demands are that of aj green and Julio Jones…Landry is nowhere near them, the dolphins used the franchise tag incorrectly and hopefully no team pays for him with a draft pick, the bears didn’t give Alshon a contract and he is far and away more talented than Landry
and they can easily afford landry now unlike Jeffrey 2 years ago when they were still paying Cutler. rookie contract QB, they have money to spend.
Bruce Allen isn’t on the hot seat. Snyder needs him around for stories about his Dad.