Tom Brady

Klemko On Heyward, Brady, Mathis, Wilson

With Peter King taking his summer vacation, Robert Klemko of TheMMQB.com stepped in this week to publish the latest Monday Morning Quarterback column, and his piece includes a number of interesting tidbits, including an explanation for why teams ought to attempt two-point conversions more often now that the extra-point kick has been moved back. Here are a handful of other notable items from Klemko’s piece:

  • Cameron Heyward is entering the final year of his contract, and is negotiating an extension with the Steelers, though he says he’d rather not think about his contract situation. The defensive lineman tells Klemko that he thinks he can play better than he did in 2014, when he ranked as Pro Football Focus’ sixth-best 3-4 defensive end. “I hope last year wasn’t a breakout season because I think I can achieve way more,” Heyward said. “I still have a mentality where I think of myself as a bust. I’ve got to prove everybody wrong including myself. I want to get better, and I want to shut people up.”
  • Tom Brady‘s camp will call many of the witnesses central to the AEI report – which criticized the Ted Wells report – to testify during the Patriots‘ signal-caller’s appeal, a source tells Klemko. As Klemko points out, Brady and the NFLPA could file a lawsuit in federal court after the appeal process is complete, challenging Roger Goodell for violating due process by declining to recuse himself as arbitrator. However, Klemko thinks that Brady’s four-game ban will be reduced to a one-game suspension, and the QB will forgo legal action to put the issue to rest.
  • Klemko hears that 10 teams are interested in Evan Mathis, which echoes what agent Drew Rosenhaus said last week. The MMQB.com scribe views the Dolphins as the favorite for the Pro Bowl guard, who may have drawn interest from even more teams if he had reached the open market sooner.
  • Based on the numbers Klemko is hearing out of the Russell Wilson extension talks, he believes the team and the player are divided on the QB’s value. Klemko predicts that the Seahawks will ultimately franchise Wilson after the 2015 season, then perhaps let him walk a year later.
  • Klemko disagrees with Titans GM Ruston Webster, who said last week that he wouldn’t be concerned if Marcus Mariota misses the first few days of training camp while the two sides finalize his rookie contract. As Klemko writes, that may be fine for a defensive tackle or safety, but a rookie quarterback – who is expected to start – needs all the training camp reps he can get. I’m inclined to agree that Webster’s comments are “a bad attempt to gain leverage” — there’s really no reason the Titans shouldn’t be able to agree to terms within the next few weeks.

Poll: What Should Tom Brady’s Suspension Be?

When Tom Brady was handed his four-game suspension, all signs pointed to the four-time Super Bowl Champion being guilty, even if there was some surprise to the severity of the penalties associated with DeflateGate.

However, since the suspension was announced, a lot has happened that may have changed the public opinion on the subject. Brady predictably appealed the suspension, and although the NFLPA asked Roger Goodell to recuse himself from the hearing, the commissioner refused.

When Brady and Roger sit down together on Tuesday, it will be with a load of new information since the Wells Report was released. In the past week, both the American Enterprise Institute and Science Now have published lengthy reports that have raised doubt in the accuracy and focus of Ted Wells’ findings, providing Brady’s case with reasonable doubt from a scientific and procedure standpoint.

Of course, that doesn’t nullify the evidence Wells collected via text message, video, and interviews during his investigation.

Of course, not many fans and pundits expect the appeal hearing with Goodell to completely exonerate the reigning Super Bowl MVP, but Brady could still see his suspension reduced to two games. If that happens, and especially if it stays at four, Brady and the NFLPA will have the option to further a pursue an appeal in court.

Either way, it should be interesting to see how this turns out for both Brady and the league.

In light of all the information we have now, how long should Brady’s suspension be?

Science On Brady’s Side In DeflateGate Appeal

A week after the American Enterprise Institute offered their rebuttal of the Ted Wells Report, Tom Brady is getting ammunition for his appeal from another source.

CSNNE.com writes that Rachel Ehrenberg of the Science News has published an article pokes holes in the science of the Wells Report, titled “Deflategate favored foul play over science.” She writes that the Wells Report fails to acknowledge scientific data on the allegedly doctored footballs.

According to Ehrenberg, the findings were “collected so haphazardly that they wouldn’t be allowed in a high school science fair.” The two different gauges differed in their readings by approximately 0.4 PSI, and it isn’t clear which was used before the game because that data was not recorded.

Also, while 11 of 12 Patriot footballs measured below 12.5 PSI at halftime, so did three out the four Colt footballs, according to one of the gauges.

Mike Petraglia of WEEI.com brings up an even more detailed summary of Ehrenberg’s report. Ehrenberg consulted a number of experts to recreate the conditions of the footballs from the night in question. Scientist Michael Naughton, an expert in condensed matters physics, recreated the situation in his lab at Boston College, finding numerous factors that could have led to the significant deflation.

Pittsburgh-based engineering firm HeadSmart labs also investigated the matter. The Wells Report had its experts as well, and Ehrenberg writes that video and text message evidence isn’t refuted by the science, but that Wells did not give the scientific possibility of DeflateGate it’s due.

All of this, plus the AEI report may still not be sufficient to get Brady off the hook for his four-game suspension. Earlier today, we heard from Ben Volin that there is no way Brady’s suspension is revoked, only possibly reduced.

However, all of these rebuttals to the Wells Report all enhance the case of Brady and the Patriots that they did nothing wrong. Should Roger Goodell, who refused to excuse himself from the appeal, uphold a suspension or even a reduced suspension, Brady and the NFLPA will have the opportunity to appeal. Especially if Goodell is not swift with his decision, Brady’s appeal in court could push the decision further back, and he keeps appealing all the way up, he may not have to serve his suspension until late in the season, or even until 2016, according to Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk.

Details Emerge On Tom Brady’s Appeal

Engulfed by lawyers, Tom Brady and Roger Goodell will face off Tuesday in the appeal summit regarding the quarterback’s four-game suspension the commissioner handed down in May for Brady’s role in Deflategate, and Ben Volin of the Boston Globe discusses how the sides will go about this procedure in New York.

One source informed Volin that Goodell only hears about 10% of these cases, and he delegated this responsibility for the recent appeals of Adrian Peterson, Josh Gordon and Greg Hardy. But with Brady serving as one of the faces of the league in the 21st century, Goodell will serve as the judge to determine whether his own judgment was justified.

Per Volin, around 12 people will be present in the meeting room: attorneys for both sides, NFLPA executive director DeMaurice Smith and Brady’s agent Don Yee will join the 16th-year quarterback and the 10th-year commissioner. Another source informed Volin that Goodell, while technically not on either side as the hearing officer in this setup, is “tame and usually fairly civil” in these circumstances. NFL executive vice president Troy Vincent and senior vice president of labor policy and government affairs Adolpho Birch could also be in the room.

It’s kind of like a court of law, but it’s a private hearing; it’s confidential,” one source told Volin. “And the jury is Goodell.”

Goodell will ask questions during each presentation, reports Volin, but the NFL and the appealing contingent do not argue directly with each other despite the acrimony that’s transpired between representatives of each side during this historic offseason ordeal.

There’s really no back-and-forth at the same time,” another source told Volin. “The appellant makes their case, then the league makes theirs, then the appellant gets to rebut it, then the league gets another chance, then both sides have closing arguments, and that’s pretty much it.”

While Brady obviously wants the entire suspension erased due to what he views is an exceedingly harsh punishment, one source told Volin the future Hall of Famer isn’t seeing any reduction, with the ban being “lenient” to begin with.

He’s getting a suspension,” that source told Volin. “The only question is, is it four or two games?”

As previously noted, Brady’s side will have a chance to present new information in an attempt to reduce or eliminate his four-game ban, and Volin notes the Patriots quarterback’s team will cite the NFL’s operations manual which states a $25K fine is the baseline for a team that tampers with footballs (although Goodell has the jurisdiction to increase it as he sees fit). Volin also reports Brady’s side, in addition to possibly using the AEI report released last week that scrutinizes Ted Wells‘ investigation and potentially providing more information from Brady’s cellphone after he initially denied access to it, will use the fact that the Panthers and Vikings were issued only a warning for placing footballs near heaters during a December 2014 contest and Brett Favre being fined just $50K for a lack of cooperation in his 2010 scandal for improper text messaging.

The NFL will back Wells’ analysis and the ruling that Brady was “generally aware” of the alleged deflation procedures. Should the summit extend beyond Tuesday, it will resume Thursday, although there is no defined timeline for the decision to come down. Volin reports the Brady ruling may not emerge until the end of July, with Hardy’s May 28 appeal still in limbo as the latest example of the pace of these proceedings.

Brady, who can still file a federal lawsuit if this ruling doesn’t go his way, will lose $1.88MM if his four-game suspension is upheld.

AEI Report Critical Of Ted Wells Report

Kevin Hassett, Joseph Sullivan, and Stan Veuger are criticizing the findings of the Ted Wells Report on deflated footballs in New England. The three authors’ work has been published on the website of the American Enterprise Institute–AEI. The New York Times also summarized this new report for their audience.

This report is timely, coming a little more than a week ahead of Tom Brady‘s appeal hearing. It could become more ammunition that exonerates Brady and the Patriots of wrongdoing, or at least generate enough doubt to help get his suspension reduced or eliminated, according to CSNNE.com.

AEI, which notably claims to have no financial stake in the findings our outcome, describes the original findings of Ted Wells to be unreliable. Among aspects of the case it calls into question, it rejects the idea that the Patriots’ footballs had a more significant drop in air pressure than did the Colts’ footballs in the first half of the AFC Championship game.

The new report also calls into question the process in which officials tested the footballs, saying that only four Colts’ football were tested at halftime as opposed to 11 of the Patriots’ footballs, and raises questions about the environments they were each tested in and the amount of gauges used before re-inflating them.

CSNNE.com notes that the AEI report on player injuries data on the heels of Bountygate helped a number of Saints’ players have their suspensions vacated in 2012, and hopes that Brady will be able to use this new information to his advantage when he meets with Commissioner Roger Goodell on June 23rd.

Goodell Won’t Recuse Himself From Brady Appeal

JUNE 2, 1:33pm: Goodell has now made it official, informing the NFLPA that he’ll hear Brady’s appeal, and won’t recuse himself, per Garafolo (Twitter links). The commissioner insists that his “mind is open” on the case, and he hasn’t pre-judged Brady.

MAY 22, 4:01pm: Despite several other writers confirming La Canfora’s report, NFLPA spokesman Greg Aiello says no final decision has been made on the union’s request for Goodell to recuse himself, tweets Mike Garafolo of Fox Sports. La Canfora tweets that while technically Goodell himself didn’t reject the NFLPA’s request, NFL lawyers filed papers saying their position is that the commissioner will hear Brady’s appeal.

3:15pm: The NFL has denied the NFL Players Association’s request for commissioner Roger Goodell to recuse himself from the union’s appeal of Tom Brady‘s four-game suspension, reports Jason La Canfora of CBSSports.com (via Twitter).

Following the NFLPA’s announcements that it had officially filed an appeal on behalf of Brady, Goodell appointed himself as the arbitrator in the case. The union felt this was a conflict of interest, particularly since the NFLPA’s counsel intended to call the commissioner as a witness during the appeal process. However, it never appeared likely that Goodell would assent to the union’s request to remove himself from the process, since the league’s CBA allows him to serve as the arbitrator.

As La Canfora observes (via Twitter), Goodell staying on as arbitrator in Brady’s appeal makes it more likely that the case will eventually go to court, unless of course the commissioner overturns the suspension. Goodell strongly hinted at the conclusion of this week’s owner’s meetings in San Francisco that the only thing that would make him reconsider the four-game ban handed down by Troy Vincent would be if Brady brings forth new information on the case — in other words, if he surrenders his emails and text messages.

No date has been set yet for Brady’s appeal hearing.

Albert Breer On Tom Brady, Deflategate

The DeflateGate rumor mill hasn’t brought much additional information over the last couple of days, but we should know more when Tom Brady will have his day in court, and his appeal hearing has been set for June 23rd.

We shouldn’t expect to hear from Brady until June 23rd, and his silence will be on the advice of his NFLPA lawyer, Jeffrey Kessler, reports Albert Breer of the NFL Network (via Twitter).

Kessler has been steadfast in his approach of keeping clients quiet in terms of media comments before hearings, and Breer writes that Brady will be treated the same way despite his high-profile stature in the league (via Twitter).

While Brady won’t be making any statements regarding air pressure or doctoring footballs, he will not be prohibited from talking football between now and June 23rd (via Twitter). He will no doubt be asked about Deflategate if he should appear in front of the media, but expect him to deflect those questions in favor of questions that pertain to on-the-field concerns.

Tom Brady’s Appeal Set For June 23

Those hoping for closure on the DeflateGate saga will have to wait at least a few more weeks. According to Adam Schefter of ESPN.com (via Twitter), Tom Brady‘s appeal hearing won’t be held until Tuesday, June 23, and may continue on Thursday, June 25, if more than one day is required.

The appeal, which is still expected to be arbitrated by NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, will give Brady and the NFL Players Association a chance to argue that the quarterback’s four-game suspension should be eliminated, or at least reduced.

Goodell has indicated that he’d be open to hearing “new information” on the case from Brady, hinting that he still wants the Patriots quarterback to hand over the emails and text messages that he didn’t surrender to Ted Wells during the DeflateGate investigation.

If Goodell decides not to reduce Brady’s suspension – and perhaps even if he does – the NFLPA is likely to file a lawsuit to take the case to court. With previous recent suspensions, such as Ray Rice‘s and Adrian Peterson‘s, a judge has overruled the NFL’s ruling.

Pats owner Robert Kraft has stated that he won’t fight the Patriots’ DeflateGate penalties, including a $1MM fine and two lost draft picks, including a first-rounder. There has been plenty of chatter suggesting that Kraft’s decision might help result in a better outcome for Brady, but reports so far have indicated that no handshake deal is in place regarding the quarterback’s appeal.

East Notes: Hardy, Brady, Mathis

The appeal hearing for Cowboys defensive end Greg Hardy will be conducted on Thursday morning with Harold Henderson in Washington D.C., according to Ed Werder of ESPN.com (on Twitter). Hardy was hit with a 10-game suspension earlier this offseason for his role in a domestic violence incident that took place roughly one year ago. Hardy made the Pro Bowl in 2013 after he compiled a career-high 15 sacks, and Pro Football Focus (subscription required) ranked him as the second-best overall defensive end in the league. Here’s a look at the AFC and NFC East..

  • The only thing delaying the date for Tom Brady‘s appeal is finding a date that works for both the Patriots quarterback and NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, Werder tweets.
  • Evan Mathis was a no-show for start of Eagles OTAs, as Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer tweets. The workouts, much like the previous programs that Mathis missed, are all voluntary. Mandatory minicamp starts on June 16th.
  • The Jets promoted Matt Bazirgan to become the new pro personnel director, according to Manish Mehta of the New York Daily News. Bazirgan, who has been with Jets since 2004, was an area scout for eight years before being promoted to assistant pro personnel director in 2013. Bazirgan replaces Brendan Prophett, who spent nine seasons as the head of the Jets’ pro personnel department.

Latest On Tom Brady, DeflateGate

Tom Brady‘s appeal for his role in DeflateGate won’t be determined by Wednesday’s 10-day deadline, two people familiar with the situation tell Rob Maaddi of The Associated Press. The collective bargaining agreement calls for appeals to be scheduled within ten days of filing, but the league and the NFLPA can agree on delaying the hearing.

It’s not immediately clear why the hearing has been held off. One could speculate that the holiday weekend has delayed the process somewhat. There could also be out-of-hearing discussions between the two parties, though it’s hard to see a settlement coming together right now given the ugliness that has transpired over the last couple of weeks.

Brady is contesting a four-game suspension handed to him for his role in the Patriots’ scandal. The team is also paying a rather stiff penalty that includes $1MM in fines and the loss of two draft picks, one of which is a first-round selection.