Adrian Peterson

Teams To Better Evaluate Player Conduct

The player conduct policy getting some exercise these past few weeks, with the domestic violence cases dominating the news. The cases of Ray Rice, Adrian Peterson, Jonathan Dwyer, and Greg Hardy all resulted in the players making headlines and missing games.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell attempted to address this in his press conference on Friday, but was undermined when the report by Don Van Natta Jr. and Kevin Van Valkenburg of ESPN was published.

Still, the best way for teams to avoid the embarrassment that the Ravens, Vikings, Cardinals, and Panthers are now deservingly subject to is to do a better job in selecting and guiding players in the organization, writes Albert Breer of NFL.com. Of course, if it was easy to pick out the future criminals and troublemakers, teams would be doing so already.

“I don’t think you’ll find an NFL team that has not put an emphasis on character, and gathering the background to understand the full picture of a player,” one AFC personnel executive told Breer. “You may have risk guys. You’re gonna measure risk to a degree. But you’re also gonna have values and principles that, in some cases, will be unwavering. … I just don’t think there’s a blanket response (in how this will change things).”

Breer writes that we will not see whether this peak in incidents will influence how teams will change their approach until the calendar draws closer to the draft and free agency. It isn’t simply a question of when teams will start becoming more cautious, but if their decisions will be effected altogether.

“I’ll be honest, it will not change anything we do,” a veteran general manager said. “I hate to say it, but it’s not like we’re saying, ‘OK, from now on, we can’t have domestic violence.’ I think the players come into the league, they’re younger, and we have to develop them from boys to men. And so we spend a lot of energy here doing that.”

The process of bringing players into the organization will be equally important as the guidance they are able to provide for those players. With young men anywhere, the NFL included, a system of developing them into mature members of society needs to continue after college.

Even still, no matter how hard the teams try to bring in high character players, it is impossible to be perfect while building a team.

“You really don’t know,” an NFC executive said. “You really, really don’t know. You gotta do your homework, but there’s no telling exactly what you’re getting.”

Florida State quarterback Jameis Winston is not playing this Saturday because of an off the field transgression that resulted in his suspension for the game against Clemson. Mike Freeman of Bleacher Report uses the Winston case as an example of the the effect the last two weeks in the NFL will have on player evaluations.

Winston won the Heisman Trophy last year for the national champion winning Seminoles, and as the reigning best player in college football, Winston and Florida State entered this weekend as the top ranked team in the country. Despite that, the most recent incident has caused many to drop Winston on their draft boards.

Freeman notes that draft guru Mel Kiper Jr. of ESPN dropped Winston from third on his board down to the 25th best player available. His colleague Bill Polian, who formerly was the general manager of the Bills teams that made it to four consecutive Super Bowls and the Peyton Manning era Colts, was asked whether he would take Winston and replied “I don’t know.”

Freeman believes players like Winston will be used as a test case for the changing demeanor amongst NFL decision makers. It is unknown if the best player in college football will be drafted in the first round. There is a chance both Hardy and Rice are free agents this offseason, assuming they are not suspended. Peterson and Dwyer both could also be looking for new teams, depending on what the Vikings and Cardinals ultimately decide to do with them once their situations play out.

In time, it will be more clear whether player conduct becomes a more vital part of the evaluation process during the draft and free agency, and if that changes the climate of the NFL.

NFC Notes: Jordan, Vikings, Buccaneers

Dolphins’ defensive end Dion Jordan has been reinstated and suspended again, due to a separate failed drug test. The team is still supporting Jordan, although there was a report that they shopped the former first-round pick this offseason, in order to gauge his trade value.

One team that inquired as to Jordan’s availability was the Eagles, and Jordan’s former college coach Chip Kelly. The Eagles were interested in acquiring Jordan via trade, and called up the Dolphins’ front office shortly after Dennis Hickey accepted the job of general manager, reports Armando Salguero of the Miami Herald.

The Dolphins had no interest in trading Jordan at that time, but Salguero wonders if the recent suspensions have created a missed opportunity for Hickey to get out from a bad investment.

Here are some other notes from around the NFC:

  • After losing Adrian Peterson to the Commissioner’s exemption list, and releasing Jerome Simpson, the Vikings have two open roster spots to fill, reports Chris Tomasson of the Pioneer Press. The team is considering bringing back fullback Zach Line back to the active roster from the practice squad. The team will most likely not fill that spot in time for their matchup against the Saints this weekend, but will look into it sometime next week.
  • After the embarrassing Thursday Night Football loss to the Falcons, which put the Buccaneers at 0-3, Jason Fitzgerald of OverTheCap.com examined how the team has constructed its roster over the past few years. The team has spent a lot of money in free agency in recent years, and although a few of those signings have failed to work out, Fitzgerald argues that the timing of their spending sprees were misguided, noting that it is better to draft a young core and add to it. The Buccaneers tried to buy their young core and skip the first step.
  • In order to loosen up his team in the days leading up to the week three battle against the Texans, head coach Tom Coughlin is allowing the Giants‘ players to play music during warmups, writes George Willis of the New York Post. The music was suggested by the player’s leadership council.

NFC North Notes: Vikings, Lions, Packers

For now, the Vikings have placed Adrian Peterson on the exempt list, continuing to pay him while he stays away from the club and doesn’t count against the 53-man roster. However, sooner or later, Minnesota will have to make a more permanent decision on the running back, and Jason La Canfora of CBSSports.com thinks terminating his contract – either later this year or next year – is the only route that really makes sense for the team.

Multiple sources who spoke to La Canfora believe the idea of a trade is a non-starter, and Peterson’s salaries and cap numbers are on the rise in coming seasons, making it unpalatable to keep him for the duration of his contract even if there were no off-field factors to consider.

Let’s check in on a few more updates from across the NFC North….

  • Don’t expect the Vikings to make a move to add a running back to their roster, tweets Alex Marvez of FOX Sports. According to Marvez, the team is comfortable moving forward with Matt Asiata, Jerick McKinnon, and Joe Banyard.
  • We’ve heard word of several players auditioning for the Lions in the past few days, and Aaron Wilson of the Baltimore Sun adds a couple more. Per Wilson (via Twitter), offensive lineman Reid Fragel and defensive back Justin Rogers auditioned for the club.
  • The Packers tried out guard James Brown, defensive back Tay Glover-Wright, and defensive tackle Greg Hickman, according to Wilson (Twitter links).
  • Packers linebacker and special-teams ace Andy Mulumba confirmed today on Twitter that he has suffered a torn ACL. While Green Bay has yet to make an official announcement, it appears likely that Mulumba will land on the injured reserve list, ending his season.

Adrian Peterson Placed On Exempt List

Late last night, Vikings ownership released a statement indicating that the team has changed course on its decision to activate running back Adrian Peterson for this weekend’s game against the Saints. Peterson, who is facing a charge of injuring a child, will be placed on the exempt/commissioner’s permission list until the legal process plays out, according to club owners Zygi Wilf and Mark Wilf. Here’s their statement in full:

“This has been an ongoing and deliberate process since last Friday’s news. In conversations with the NFL over the last two days, the Vikings advised the League of the team’s decision to revisit the situation regarding Adrian Peterson. In response, the League informed the team of the option to place Adrian on the Exempt/Commissioner’s Permission list, which will require that Adrian remain away from all team activities while allowing him to take care of his personal situation until the legal proceedings are resolved. After giving the situation additional thought, we have decided this is the appropriate course of action for the organization and for Adrian.

“We are always focused on trying to make the right decision as an organization. We embrace our role – and the responsibilities that go with it – as a leader in the community, as a business partner and as an organization that can build bridges with our fans and positively impact this great region. We appreciate and value the input we have received from our fans, our partners and the community.

“While we were trying to make a balanced decision yesterday, after further reflection we have concluded that this resolution is best for the Vikings and for Adrian. We want to be clear: we have a strong stance regarding the protection and welfare of children, and we want to be sure we get this right. At the same time we want to express our support for Adrian and acknowledge his seven-plus years of outstanding commitment to this organization and this community. Adrian emphasized his desire to avoid further distraction to his teammates and coaches while focusing on his current situation; this resolution accomplishes these objectives as well.

“We will support Adrian during this legal and personal process, but we firmly believe and realize this is the right decision. We hope that all of our fans can respect the process that we have gone through to reach this final decision.”

With Peterson set to sit out until the legal process concludes, the longtime Viking figures to have more incentive to reach some sort of resolution in his case sooner rather than later, writes Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk, pointing out that Peterson’s status will give leverage to prosecutors. As Ben Goessling of ESPN.com notes (via Twitter), currently, Peterson isn’t due in court for the first time until October 8, and there’s a possibility a trial wouldn’t happen until 2015, meaning the Pro Bowler could miss the entire season.

Although Peterson’s season appears to be in jeopardy, this is a decision he’s on board with, according to Ed Werder of ESPN.com, who tweets that the NFLPA consulted with the running back about the move and Peterson decided to accept it rather than challenge it. Per Ian Rapoport of NFL.com (via Twitter), the Vikings will still be paying Peterson during his time on the exempt list — he won’t earn an accrued season if he isn’t on the 53-man roster for six games, but that’s not as crucial at this stage of Peterson’s career as it would be for a younger player.

Now that the Vikings have made this drastic a move with Peterson, it could provide a road map for the Panthers as they decide how to handle their own situation with Greg Hardy. A Panthers source tells Werder (Twitter link) that Carolina now has “more to consider” as the club weighs what to do with Hardy.

Adrian Peterson Expected To Play Week 3?

TUESDAY, 4:55pm: Don’t be surprised if the Vikings reverse course on whether to reinstate Peterson, according to Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk, who hears that Monday’s decision could change (Twitter link).

MONDAY, 6:46pm: According to the KHOU report (via Deadspin), these newest accusations could be used against Peterson in court. More immediately, if the accusations are true, they make the Vikings’ decision to reinstate the running back even more questionable.

6:34pm: Peterson has been accused of abusing another one of his sons, according to CBS affiliate KHOU (on Twitter).

1:35pm: Peterson has issued a statement, in which he expresses remorse for hurting his son, and says he is “without a doubt, not a child abuser.”

“I have to live with the fact that when I disciplined my son the way I was disciplined as a child, I caused an injury that I never intended or thought would happen,” Peterson said within the statement. “I know that many people disagree with the way I disciplined my child. I also understand after meeting with a psychologist that there are other alternative ways of disciplining a child that may be more appropriate.”

ESPN.com’s Adam Schefter has the running back’s comments in full, via Facebook.

10:57am: After being deactivated for the Vikings’ Week 2 loss against the Patriots, Adrian Peterson will return to practice this week and is expected to suit up and play for Minnesota this Sunday, the team announced today. Here’s the complete statement, via the club’s website, from owners Zygi Wilf and Mark Wilf:

“Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.

“To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.

“We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.”

Peterson was indicted by a grand jury last week and, facing one charged count of injury to a child, turned himself in over the weekend. No court date has been set yet, but assuming the case goes to trial, that may not happen for weeks or even months, meaning the Vikings and the NFL may postpone any further discipline for the running back until 2015, after the case is resolved.

Earlier today, Jason Fitzgerald of Over the Cap explained why a trade of Peterson was much more viable than releasing him, if Minnesota wanted to move on from the longtime Viking, while Joel Corry of CBSSports.com pointed out (via Twitter) that the veteran’s rising salaries may make him a cap casualty within the next couple years anyway. For now though, it appears the club intends to move forward this season with Peterson very much in the mix.

Poll: Should Peterson, Hardy Play Week 3?

After last week’s Ray Rice drama led to the Ravens cutting their running back and the league suspending him indefinitely, attention has shifted this week to a pair of other cases of off-field violence involving NFL players. Adrian Peterson, who was indicted and charged with injuring a child, and Greg Hardy, who was recently found guilty by a judge of assaulting and threatening to kill his ex-girlfriend, were both inactive in Week 2.

However, Peterson has since been reinstated by the Vikings, and it sounds like the Panthers are at least considering doing the same for Hardy. The NFL typically allows for due process, waiting until cases have fully played out before announcing disciplinary measures for players. In these cases, however, while the legal process hasn’t been completed, Peterson has admitted to causing injury to his son, while Hardy has been found guilty by a judge, if not yet a jury.

Given the increased pressure on the NFL to come down hard on off-field instances of domestic violence and abuse in the wake of the Rice incident, the league appears to be mulling intervening in the cases of both Peterson and Hardy. We heard as much regarding Hardy’s case earlier this morning, and Jason Cole of Bleacher Report says the league is taking a long look at Peterson’s case as well.

The Peterson incident, which was publicly reported more recently than Hardy’s altercation, seems to be drawing more attention around the NFL and beyond, with Minnesota governor Mark Dayton suggesting today that the Vikings should have kept the running back suspended until the accusation of abuse is resolved in the legal system. Robert Klemko of TheMMQB.com and others have also pointed out that the Vikings’ call for “due process” didn’t seem to apply to less talented players previously on the roster who ran into legal troubles of their own.

What do you think? Are you fine with seeing Peterson and Hardy on the field until their cases have been closed? Or do we already know enough in both instances that their teams – or the league – would be justified in keeping them out of action for Week 3 and beyond?

NFC Notes: Murray, Lewis, Hocker, Vikings

If DeMarco Murray wants to discuss his next contract, Cowboys COO Stephen Jones is all ears, writes Jon Machota of The Dallas Morning News.

We certainly wouldn’t be against that,” Jones said Monday on 105.3 The Fan [KRLD-FM]. “Long term, we’ve told DeMarco that we’d love to have him here. At the end of the day, it’s no different than Dez [Bryant], we want to keep our good players and DeMarco is one of them. I think I said something to that effect in camp. He’s a guy that we would like to see stay here long term. He’s certainly only increased our desire to have him stay.”

Here are some other notes from around the NFL this Monday:

  • Former Bills’ quarterback Thaddeus Lewis tried out for the Rams on Monday, reports Field Yates of ESPN.com (via Twitter). Lewis started five games for the Bills in 2013, and spent time with the Rams, Browns, and Lions before that.
  • Former Arkansas kicker Zach Hocker visited the Redskins, according to Aaron Wilson of the National Football Post (on Twitter).
  • In the thick of the Adrian Peterson controversy, one of the Vikings‘ major sponsors, the Radisson Hotel suspended their sponsorship of the team, reports the Associated Press in USA Today“We are closely following the situation and effective immediately, Radisson is suspending its limited sponsorship of the Minnesota Vikings while we evaluate the facts and circumstances,” the company said in a statement.

Adrian Peterson Cleared In Second Incident

Controversy struck again for Adrian Peterson on Monday. After the Vikings decided to activate him, with intent to play him this weekend against the Saints, reports of a second child abuse incident surfaced, involving another one of Peterson’s sons by a different mother.

A report was filed to Child Protective Services, acccording to Ben Goessling of ESPN.com and the Associated Press. No files were charged in the case.

According to TMZ, the case did not progress despite the four-year old son of Peterson having a scar on his head. Peterson reportedly did not strike his son on the head to cause the scar. That injury was ruled to be an accident.

The updated report also notes that the form of discipline in this second case was “not impermissible” under Texas law. This incident occurred in June of 2013, and while it may color the current investigation, it is unlikely to amount to anything on its own merits.

Teammates React To Peterson’s Absence

While the Vikings have decided not to address the Adrian Peterson situation until Monday, his absence became a huge part of the story of the team’s 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots.

Master Tesfatsion of the Star Tribune captured some of head coach Mike Zimmer’s press conference following the loss.

“I don’t want to discuss the Adrian issue at all today,” said Zimmer. “This is about the football game here. We’ll talk about it Monday or whenever we have the press conference on.”

While Tesfatsion noted many players declined to comment on playing without the star running back, there were some players willing to discuss it. Tom Pelissero of USA Today noted that even players who were willing to broach the subject, they had no answers for the media.

“He’s one of the best players in the NFL. Obviously, everybody knows that,” said linebacker Chad Greenway. “The reality is there’s going to be some interesting times ahead. We don’t know what’s going to happen.”

“I don’t think we have any excuses for what happened out there today,” said center John Sullivan. “If you go out and execute the way we did on the first drive the entire game, this question isn’t being asked right now.”

“We obviously don’t condone any of the alleged (actions),” said safety Harrison Smith. “But we’re going to stand behind our guys, and that’s pretty much all I’ve got to say.”

The entire organization was still frustrated following the blowout loss. Zimmer made an emphasis on how little the lack of Peterson influenced the game.

“It didn’t affect the team,” said Zimmer. “You know what affected the team? Throwing interceptions. Getting a field goal blocked. Not tackling well enough. Having penalties on defense.”

The team will likely not have Peterson rejoin the team anytime soon, and must go into a game against the 0-2 Saints without their best offensive weapon. The team’s new best player on the offense also commented on how the team is handling the situation, according to Mark Craig of the Star Tribune (via Twitter).

“We just have to get that mindset,” said Cordarrelle Patterson. “28 probably ain’t going to be here with us.”

Vikings To Address Peterson Situation Monday

The Vikings plan to make a decision on Adrian Peterson‘s roster status on Monday, general manager Rick Spielman told Sal Paolantonio of ESPN (Twitter link via Palantonio’s colleague, Kevin Seifert). Following Peterson’s indictment for child abuse, Minnesota will not make a “knee-jerk decision,” per Spielman, but “all options are on the table” (link).

Peterson will not play in today’s game against the Patriots after the Vikings chose to deactivate him. But as Jason La Canfora of CBSSports.com writes, the new CBA restricts a team from continuing to deactivate a player for an ongoing period of time. Minnesota, then, has three options regarding its star running back: keep him on the roster; allow him to be present at the team’s facility and practices, but deactivate him on gamedays; or suspend him without pay.

Sources tell Ian Rapoport of NFL.com (on Twitter) that Peterson’s deactivation will likely last for longer than just Week 2. La Canfora reports that the NFL is not likely to take action against Peterson any time soon, even in the wake of the Ray Rice incident. Instead, the Vikings will continue to act proactively against Peterson, lessening the need for league intervention.

Peterson’s indictment could have ramifications that go beyond the current season, according to Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk. While Peterson is obviously still talented, he is 29 years old, plays a devalued position, and is owed more than $43MM in base salary over the next three years. This incident could make it viable for the Vikings to release Peterson, a move that would have seemed highly unlikely just last week. But with this ugly episode hanging over Peterson’s head, Minnesota could cut him, and only see $2.4MM in dead money.