Month: November 2024

Santonio Holmes Cut Expected Soon

The Jets are expected to cut Santonio Holmes “any day now,” a league source tells Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk. We’ve expected for some time that Holmes would be released this offseason, and now it seems that could happen in advance of free agency, allowing the veteran receiver to get a headstart on the process.

Holmes, 29, has played in just 15 games for the Jets over the last two seasons due to foot issues, and even when he’s played, his production has been down. He has compiled 43 catches, 728 yards, and two TDs overall in the last two seasons.

In an effort to provide weapons for Geno Smith or the veteran signal-caller the team brings in to compete for the QB job, New York is in the market for receiving help this offseason, and cutting Holmes will create some cap space to pursue free agents. By releasing Holmes before his $1MM roster bonus is due on March 13, the club can reduce his $10.75MM cap hit to just $2.5MM in dead money, creating more than $8MM in cap savings. A report earlier this month indicated that Emmanuel Sanders and Jeremy Maclin are among the receivers who could interest the Jets, assuming they reach free agency.

As for Holmes, Florio identifies the Rams, Cardinals, and Steelers as potential suitors once he’s officially released. However, Florio’s suggestions appear to be speculation based primarily on coaching staffs rather than any concrete interest expressed by those clubs.

Bears Re-Sign Roberto Garza

11:29am: Garza’s contract includes a $100K signing bonus and $75K workout bonus, tweets Jeff Dickerson of ESPNChicago.com.

11:14am: Garza’s new one-year deal will be worth $1.5MM, according to ESPN.com’s Michael C. Wright (via Twitter).

11:03am: The Bears have locked up center Roberto Garza before he hits free agency, according to Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune. Biggs reports (via Twitter) that the team has re-signed Garza to a one-year contract.

Garza, who will turn 35 next month, has started all but two of Chicago’s contests over the last eight seasons, having transitioned from guard to center in 2011. The longtime Bear continued to perform at an above-average level in 2013, ranking 12th overall among 35 qualified centers, including sixth as a pass-blocker, according to Pro Football Focus’ metrics (subscription required).

When I examined the free agent market for centers this week, I ranked Garza near the top of the second tier of available options, writing that his age would likely prevent him from getting more than a short-term deal. It’s not clear how much longer Garza plans to play, but head coach Marc Trestman suggested last week that the former fourth-round pick should finish his career as a Bear. I imagine if Garza continues to play well in 2014 and wants to play another season, the team will be very open to re-signing him again a year from now.

Financial details for the one-year agreement aren’t yet known.

NFC Notes: Wharton, Panthers, Lions, Saints

The Panthers have already lost one starting lineman to retirement this week, when longtime left tackle Jordan Gross called it a career. Now, left guard Travelle Wharton tells Joseph Person of the Charlotte Observer that he’s not 100% sure about his future either. However, it sounds like if he keeps playing, the free agent lineman wants to do so in Carolina.

“I love it here in Charlotte. This is where we want to live,” Wharton said. “If there’s going to be a next year, we have to sit down and talk about it.”

Here’s more on the Panthers and a couple other NFC teams:

  • Steve Smith‘s age (35 in May) and contract ($9MM in dead money, three years remaining) make him a tricky case for the Panthers, as Jason Fitzgerald explores in his latest piece at OverTheCap.com. Fitzgerald thinks it makes sense for the two sides to continue their relationship, but makes some suggestions for how to make the veteran receiver’s contract more tenable for the club.
  • When the Lions inked Matthew Stafford to his long-term contract extension last summer, the team agreed to defer the payment of $17.5MM of his $27.5MM signing bonus. That bill has come due, according to Dave Birkett of the Detroit Free Press, who says the team will pay Stafford the remainder of the bonus this Friday. Glover Quin, Reggie Bush, and Jason Jones will also receive deferred bonus money within the next few weeks, but the lump-sum payments won’t alter the team’s cap outlook.
  • Running back Mikel Leshoure expressed a desire for a bigger role, either in Detroit or elsewhere, and it looks like he may receive that opportunity with the Lions, writes Kyle Meinke of MLive.com.
  • Add linebacker and special teams player Ramon Humber to the growing list of pending Saints free agents who have had early discussions with the club about a new deal, writes Ramon Antonio Vargas of The Advocate.

Eagles, Cooper Agree To Five-Year Deal

9:22am: Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk provides a few more details on Cooper’s salary, reporting that $4MM comes in the form of a signing bonus, $4MM in base salary is fully guaranteed, and $2MM in 2015 salary is guaranteed for injury only. That $2MM becomes fully guaranteed if Cooper is still on the roster on the first day of the 2015 league year.

8:38am: Cooper’s deal includes $10MM in guaranteed money, tweets Jason La Canfora of CBSSports.com.

THURSDAY, 8:03am: The agreement between Cooper and the Eagles is actually for a five-year contract, according to Adam Schefter of ESPN.com (Twitter link). Schefter reports that the deal will be worth $25MM, good for a $5MM annual average.

Meanwhile, Mosher continues to hear that the deal is essentially a four-year pact, and is only five years “by letter of the law.” He tweets that the final year is likely voidable.

WEDNESDAY, 8:18pm: The Eagles and wide receiver Riley Cooper have agreed to a four-year deal, according to Geoff Mosher of CSNPhilly.com (on Twitter). Cooper is expected to ink the deal tomorrow. Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer first reported that the two sides were nearing agreement.

Cooper, 26, closed out his rookie deal in style with a breakout season in 2013. After being at the center of a preseason controversy when he used a racial slur, Cooper got positive attention by setting career-highs in receptions (47), receiving yards (835), and receiving touchdowns (8). Terms of the deal are not yet known but some speculated that he would see multiyear offers in the $5MM per year range if he hit the open market.

In addition to Cooper, Eagles receiver Jeremy Maclin is also eligible for unrestricted free agency in March. While some thought that it would turn into a one-or-the-other scenario, today’s reports indicate that both could be back in Philly for 2014. The Eagles freed up a little cap room earlier today when they extended Jason Peters‘ contract, so it’ll be a little easier to find space for both of their free agent receivers.

Eagles To Extend Jason Kelce

THURSDAY, 8:05am: The Eagles and Kelce are in agreement on an extension, which will be a six-year deal worth $37.5MM, reports Adam Caplan of ESPN.com (via Twitter). According to Caplan, $13MM of that money will be guaranteed.

Since Kelce hadn’t been slated to hit free agency until next winter, he’s now under contract for seven years, through the 2020 season. His deal can max out at over $40MM, and makes him one of the top five highest-paid centers in the NFL.

WEDNESDAY, 4:37pm: It’s been a busy day for the Eagles, who have announced a long-term contract extension for left tackle Jason Peters and are reportedly closing in on a new deal for Riley Cooper. However, it seems the club isn’t done making moves. According to Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Eagles are expected to announce a new multiyear extension for center Jason Kelce in the near future, perhaps as soon as tomorrow.

Kelce is set to enter the final year of his rookie contract in 2014, and has developed into one of the league’s top centers since being selected in the sixth round of the 2011 draft. The 26-year-old started all 16 games for the Eagles in 2013, and his performance ranked first among 35 qualified centers, according to Pro Football Focus’ metrics (subscription required).

Contracts for centers aren’t as lucrative as those inked by left tackles, and Kelce’s new salary may also be limited by a lack of public recognition for his play — unlike Peters, he has yet to earn a spot in a Pro Bowl. Still, an annual salary of $4MM+ would make Kelce one of the top 10 highest-paid centers in the NFL, and it wouldn’t be surprising to see him receive more than that from the Eagles.

Jason La Canfora of CBSSports.com and McLane (Twitter links) both reported earlier today that Kelce would likely be the next Eagles lineman to receive a contract extension.

Contract Bonuses

When a player signs an NFL contract, the key piece of his annual salary is the P5 amount, or what we know as the base salary. That’s the amount that the player actually earns in weekly installments throughout the NFL season. However, there aren’t many deals whose entire dollar amounts consist of the base salary. Generally, NFL contracts also include various kinds of bonus money, including perhaps signing bonuses, option bonuses, roster bonuses, or workout bonuses.

For salary cap purposes, this bonus money is counted differently than a player’s base salary, and also may or may not be earned, depending on what specific kind of bonus it is. To better understand exactly how these contract bonuses work, let’s break down the various types that can be included in a player’s contract….

Signing bonus:

The most common type of bonus, it’s typically reported at the time a contract is signed. While a player who receives an $8MM signing bonus on a new four-year contract generally receives that lump-sum payment up front, that $8MM actually prorates over the course of the deal for salary cap purposes. So it would count on the cap as $2MM per year, rather than $8MM in year one.

Signing bonuses prorate for up to a maximum of five years, so for a player inking a six- or seven-year deal with a $15MM signing bonus, that amount would count for $3MM against the cap for the first five seasons of the contract.

These prorated bonuses also represent guaranteed money, whereas other types of bonuses aren’t guaranteed at the time of the signing. That can make it tricky to release a player early on in a contract that included a large signing bonus. When a team releases a player, his remaining prorated bonus money “accelerates,” meaning it applies to his cap hit in the current league year. So if that aforementioned player who signed a four-year contract with an $8MM signing bonus is released in the second year of the deal, the remaining $6MM in prorated bonus money accelerates and counts against the cap for that season.

The effect of acceleration can be alleviated slightly by designating a player as a “June 1 cut,” or actually releasing the player after June 1. This allows the team to spread the so-called dead money remaining on a player’s contract over the course of two seasons rather than having it all apply to the current league year.

Option bonus:

An option bonus functions in a similar manner as the signing bonus, but applies to a later season. When the option bonus is due, perhaps in the second or third year of a contract, the team must commit to paying the full bonus if it intends to keep the player on its roster.

Using the above example of a player who signed a four-year contract with an $8MM signing bonus, let’s say that deal also includes a $3MM option bonus in the second year. If the team keeps the player, it will be on the hook for the new $3MM bonus, which will prorate and be worth $1MM per year in the remaining three seasons. So the last three years of the contract would each now feature $3MM in total annual bonus money — the initial $2MM per year due to the signing bonus, plus the new $1MM due to the option bonus.

Like the signing bonus, the option bonus represents guaranteed money once it’s picked up, so contracts that include both forms of bonuses become even trickier to release due to the increase in dead money.

Roster bonus:

Roster bonuses act as a sort of pay-as-you-go charge for teams. They’re not initially guaranteed, but must be paid at certain dates if the club intends to keep the player on its roster.

In many cases, a roster bonus is a lump sum due shortly after the new league year begins. For instance, Jets quarterback Mark Sanchez has a $2MM roster bonus owed to him next month if the team doesn’t release him by March 25. This form of bonus is fairly player-friendly, since even if the team doesn’t intend to pay it (like the Jets with Sanchez), it means the player will be released early in the league year, giving him plenty of time to catch on with a new team.

Another form of roster bonus is the per-game variety, which is more club-friendly. In that case, a player typically earns a portion of his roster bonus each time he remains on the team’s 53-man roster for a regular season game.

Roster bonuses contribute to a player’s salary, but unlike signing or option bonuses, the roster bonuses still remaining on a player’s deal when he’s released don’t need to be paid. So if and when the Jets release Sanchez, the team will be off the hook not only for his $2MM 2014 roster bonus, but also the $1MM roster bonuses he’s owed in 2015 and 2016.

Workout bonus:

Teams can’t force player to participate in their offseason workout program, so clubs will often include workout bonuses in contracts to encourage players to show up for those offseason workouts.

If a player has a 2014 workout bonus worth $100K, he earns that money by participating in the team’s offseason workout program, and that amount remains on his cap number for the season. However, if he chooses to forgo the workout program, he simply doesn’t earn that $100K, which is removed from his ’14 cap hit.

If a deal includes workout bonuses, they’re typically worth the same amount every year. So a player who forgos a $100K workout bonus this season could still be eligible for a workout bonus worth the same amount in 2015. As is the case with roster bonuses, teams aren’t on the hook for future workout bonuses if the player is released.

Bonus incentives:

While they’re less widely reported, bonus incentives can also be included in a player’s contract, allowing the player to earn additional salary if he meets certain criteria. These incentives are considered either “likely to be earned” or “unlikely to be earned,” depending on whether the player met the criteria the year before.

Because the designation of an incentive relies on the previous year’s performance, the likely/unlikely binary doesn’t always make sense. For instance, an incentive for a Pro Bowl berth could be considered likely to be earned if the player was in the Pro Bowl the year before. However, if a wide receiver missed a season due to injury, including an incentive for catching 20 balls the following season would be considered unlikely to be earned, since he didn’t reach 20 catches the previous season.

At the start of the league year, incentive bonus money counts against the cap as long as it’s likely to be earned. At the end of the year, a player’s cap number is adjusted to reflect which bonuses he earned and which ones he didn’t.

While differentiating these bonuses can be tricky at first, the best way to understand the differences between them is to study contracts that include several different forms of bonuses. For our purposes, let’s pretend a 2014 free agent signs a six-year contract worth an overall amount of $55MM. The breakdown is as follows:

The player’s annual base salary starts at $3MM and increases by $1MM each year. The deal includes a $10MM signing bonus, as well as a $5MM option bonus due in 2015. There’s also a $2MM roster bonus due on the fifth day of the 2016 league year, with $1MM roster bonuses due at the same time in 2017 and 2018. Throw in annual workout bonuses worth $500K and here’s what the contract would look like (click to enlarge):

Sample NFL contract

Because this player’s cap number doesn’t rise to eight figures until 2016, his $10MM guaranteed signing bonus ensures that the team wouldn’t create any cap savings by releasing him until at least the third year of the deal, even if none of his base salary is guaranteed. Even in ’16, the savings would be extremely limited — $6MM in signing bonus money and $4MM in option bonus money would accelerate, creating $10MM in dead money. In fact, assuming the option bonus is in fact exercised in 2015, those two prorated bonuses ensure there’s a significant amount of dead money in this hypothetical deal up until 2018, at which point the team would be on the hook for just $4MM if the player was released.

This is an example of a player-friendly contract, and it shows why a team may be reluctant to rely too heavily on signing or option bonuses, which limit the club’s cap flexibility. A more team-friendly contract may exclude those bonuses in favor of roster and workout bonuses, which don’t have to be paid unless the player remains on the roster.

For more information on how teams can create cap space by turning base salary into bonus money, check out our earlier piece on restructuring contracts.

Note: This is a PFR Glossary entry. Our glossary posts will explain specific rules relating to free agency, trades, or other aspects of the NFL’s Collective Bargaining Agreement. Information from Over the Cap was used in the creation of this post.

Extra Points: Ware, Packers, Graham, Smith

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said recently on ESPN’s SportsCenter that it’s possible the club will part ways with DeMarcus Ware to avoid a sizable cap hit. Meanwhile, Ian Rapoport of NFL Network (on Twitter) hears that Dallas has yet to ask Ware to take a pay cut and there has been no communication between the two sides. Here’s tonight’s look around the league..

  • The Packers would like to have restricted free agent linebacker Jamari Lattimore back on the roster next season, but don’t appear ready to offer him the right-of-first-refusal tender, according to Pete Dougherty of the Green Bay Press-Gazette. With Green Bay likely willing to offer a salary closer to the minimum, Lattimore figures to test the open market.
  • There’s a lot of debate over whether Saints star Jimmy Graham should be designated as a tight end or a wide receiver when it comes to the franchise tag, but Ian Rapoport of NFL.com rightfully notes that it’s a decision made by the league office, not the team.
  • The Saints have reached out to running back Pierre Thomas to discuss his future with the club, writes Larry Holder of The Times-Picayune.
  • Panthers general manager Dave Gettleman recently acknowledged that the club could conceivably cut ties with Steve Smith this summer and the wide receiver is less than thrilled about hearing that second hand, writes Jonathan Jones of the Charlotte Observer.
  • The Rams plan to take a wait-and-see approach with their backup quarterback situation, writes ESPN.com’s Nick Wagoner.
  • Raiders free agent defensive tackle Vance Walker has signed with A3 NFL agent Tommy Sims, according to Liz Mullen of Sports Business Journal (on Twitter). He was formerly repped by 5 Star Athlete Management.

Luke Adams contributed to this post.

Patriots Notes: McCourty, Gronkowski, Talib

Last we heard, the Patriots have yet to enter negotiations with free agent center Ryan Wendell about a new deal or talk to Logan Mankins about an extension to reduce his cap number. If the Pats do come to the table, however, both are expected to be receptive. The latest out of Foxboro..

  • It seems likely that the Patriots will approach defensive back Devin McCourty about working out a new contract, but he’s not concerned about it either way, writes the Boston Herald’s Jeff Howe. McCourty has a year remaining on his rookie deal, which saw his 2014 cap number skyrocket to $5.115MM. The Pats could reduce that cap hit by about $2MM by shuffling around some money through a new deal.
  • Rob Gronkowski signed a lucrative contract extension with the Pats to give him a total deal of $55MM+ over eight years, keeping him off the open market. But, with Jimmy Graham perhaps on the brink of a record-breaking deal, Field Yates of ESPNBoston.com wonders what Gronk would get if he were a free agent.
  • Adam Lefkoe and Jeff Howe of The Boston Herald (video link) looked at the Patriots’ situation with cornerback Aqib Talib and whether they’ll be able to sign him to a long-term contract. Howe doesn’t believe that New England will hit him with the franchise tag if they can’t hammer out a new deal.

AFC Notes: Browns, Raiders, Jackson, Ravens

Appearing on the Dan Patrick Show on Wednesday, NFL Media’s Daniel Jeremiah said that he’s hearing “from several different places” that the Browns are targeting quarterback Derek Carr with the No. 26 pick rather than drafting a signal-caller at No. 4 (link via Marc Sessler of NFL.com). Of course, there’s plenty of time for that stance to change over the next two and a half months. More out of the AFC..

  • Raiders owner Mark Davis spoke to Vic Tafur of the San Francisco Chronicle about the need for a franchise quarterback, the team’s boatload of cap space, and whether or not this is a make-or-break year in Oakland.
  • Mike Wilkening of Pro Football Talk expects the Broncos and Titans to be in the mix for linebacker D’Qwell Jackson, who hit the free agent market today when he was cut by the Browns. Seven teams have reached out to Jackson since his release and he’s currently deciding where to visit first, tweets Jason La Canfora of NFL.com.
  • Torrey Smith is very open to the idea of the Ravens adding a receiver in free agency or the draft, as he tells Jeff Zrebiec of the Baltimore Sun. “The more, the merrier,” Smith said. “The more help you can have no matter what position it is, it’s only going to make us stronger as a unit. Whatever we bring in, whether it’s free agency or a rookie, we’ll welcome him in with open arms.”
  • Although Mike Chappell of the Indianapolis Star suggested yesterday that Adam Vinatieri could be a franchise tag option for the Colts, that’s not the case, according to Joel Corry of CBSSports.com (via Twitter). As Corry notes, even though Vinatieri didn’t play out two seasons as the Patriots‘ franchise player, he was tagged twice by New England, meaning he’d be eligible for the quarterback’s franchise salary if he were tagged a third time.

Packers Re-Sign Chris Banjo

The Packers have re-signed exclusive rights free agent Chris Banjo to a one-year contract, according to Pete Dougherty of the Green Bay Press-Gazette (Twitter link). Terms of the deal aren’t known, but it’s almost certainly worth $495K, the minimum salary for a player with one year of NFL experience.

Banjo, a safety, went undrafted in 2012, then signed with the Jaguars in the summer of 2013. After he was cut by Jacksonville, the former Southern Methodist standout inked a deal with the Packers and earned a spot on the team’s regular season roster. Banjo saw some action in the secondary for Green Bay in his rookie season, playing 192 overall snaps, and will likely have to compete for a roster spot and playing time again in 2014.