NFL To Begin Training Replacement Referees; NFLRA Negotiations Ongoing
The expiration of the current CBA between the NFL and the NFL Referees Association continues to loom. A gap remains between the parties, and as expected efforts to prepare replacement officials are underway.
The league sent a memo to its teams on Wednesday stating the onboarding process of replacements has begun. “Several” officials have now completed background checks with the league, as detailed by ESPN’s Kevin Seifert. Training sessions – online and in person – are set to begin on or around May 1, he adds.
The CBA between the league and current referees is set to expire on May 31. In the absence of an agreement, replacement officials will be used during offseason work and training camp. Teams will be asked to offer feedback on the performance of the replacements while plans are made for the regular season.
“The league remains committed to reaching a fair and reasonable agreement with the NFRA but will be prepared in the event no agreement is reached prior to the expiration of the current agreement on May 31, 2026,” an earlier memo from senior VP of officiating Perry Fewell reads (h/t Tom Pelissero of NFL Network).
Earlier rounds of negotiations between the parties did not yield much in the way of progress. The NFL has offered a six-year contract carrying an average pay increase of 6.45% while attempting to bring about several changes to the structure of officiating. Longer probationary terms, a larger offseason period for training and prioritizing in-game performance over seniority for playoff assignments have proven to be key factors from the league’s perspective and have emerged as sticking points in negotiations.
A new set of talks recently took place, as noted by Pelissero’s colleague Ian Rapoport. Those negotiations were productive, Seifert reports. Further talks are expected to take place prior to the May 31 deadline. Multiple owners who serve on committees were personally involved in recent negotiations, and Pelissero adds Jerry Jones was among them. The Cowboys owner has supported the NFL’s position on matters such as performance-based pay and more offseason training. It will be interesting to see if those factors and others see movement in the near future. Otherwise, replacement officials will be present for spring and summer practices.
Browns Could Prioritize T Over WR In First Round
APRIL 16: Moving down from No. 6 remains a possibility to watch for in the Browns’ case, Tony Pauline of Essentially Sports writes. In any event, he adds that Fano in particular is a prospect viewed as one Cleveland believes can handle left tackle duties at the NFL level. It will be interesting to see how the Browns proceed along the offensive line in general and with respect to Fano in particular on Day 1 of the draft.
APRIL 11: The draft needs in Cleveland are fairly obvious, and though they can’t address all of them in the first round of the 2026 NFL Draft, they can address two. Early reports seem to indicate that wide receiver and offensive tackle are the biggest priorities for the Browns heading into the draft, but which position will they address with their sixth overall pick, and which will have to wait for pick No. 24?
Now, Cleveland didn’t lose anybody from its 2025 receiving corps, but the group from last year underperformed to a point that it can be considered a position of need. Additionally, there are only two players in the room not playing on contract years in 2026, and those players are only under contract for one more year than their corpsman. If the Browns are going to begin rebuilding the room around a new, young pair of hands, now would be an ideal time.
The situation on the offensive line is almost the opposite. With all five starters hitting the free agent market this offseason, Cleveland has been working to rebuild its line after the teardown. The team utilized free agency to bring in guard Zion Johnson and center Elgton Jenkins and traded for former Texans tackle Tytus Howard. It seems the door is open for guard Joel Bitonio to return, if he decides not to retire, but if he does, the Browns re-signed Teven Jenkins, who has plenty of starting experience at guard. The other tackle spot is currently being manned by Dawand Jones, the former fourth-round pick who’s started 20 games in his first three seasons.
According to Ian Rapoport of NFL Network, there’s belief that a vast need for quality linemen and a large number of talented prospects could lead to a run on offensive tackles in the first round. At the same time, it’s believed that only two wide receivers could end up going in the top half of the draft, with the eventual WR3 projected to go anywhere from pick Nos. 16-19. Because of this, it would make much more sense for the Browns to address their offensive tackle need than their receiver need.
Locking down the draft’s top receiver — likely Ohio State’s Carnell Tate — would certainly be a great addition to the offense, but it would mean missing out on most of the class’s top tackle prospects if a run takes place. Locking down a top available tackle would mean missing out on Tate, and perhaps Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson and USC’s Makai Lemon, but there are several impact options that make perfect sense in the late-first or early-second round. It could be the difference of having Tate and choosing between Arizona State’s Max Iheanachor, Northwestern’s Caleb Tiernan, or Memphis’ Travis Burke or having one of Utah’s Spencer Fano, Miami’s Francis Mauigoa, Georgia’s Monroe Freeling, or Alabama’s Kadyn Proctor then getting your pick of Texas A&M’s KC Concepcion, Indiana’s Omar Cooper Jr., Washington’s Denzel Boston, Alabama’s Germie Bernard, and Louisville’s Chris Bell.
An interesting additional factor to this situation is the reporting that the Browns have been shopping out their current draft slots in the hope of bringing in more Day 2 draft capital; they seemingly are willing to move down from either the sixth or 24th picks, per Zac Jackson of The Athletic. That could explain the depth at which Cleveland has been researching top offensive tackle prospects, as Mary Kay Cabot of Cleveland.com reports. The team hosted Utah’s other tackle, Caleb Lomu, two days ago, per Jackson McCurry of The Dawg Land podcast, and ESPN’s Jordan Reid was “shocked’ to hear that the Browns reportedly like Proctor at No. 6.
In theory, both could be trade down targets. Proctor has routinely found himself ranked behind the likes of Mauigoa and Fano throughout the draft process, and even more recently, Freeling and, in some cases, Clemson’s Blake Miller have snuck by him in the eyes of draft pundits, as well.
Perhaps, the Browns are not interested in selecting Proctor at No. 6 overall but, instead, interested in trading back to a place in the first round in which they may still be able to walk away with Proctor — or, if there’s a serious run at the position, Lomu — while adding some picks in the process. With the depth of wide receivers listed above, they could easily attempt to do the same at that position, if they feel their preferred option may be a reach at No. 24.
The Browns’ toss up in priorities between tackle and wide receiver alone make it impossible to predict who their top overall pick will be. Adding in the potential for a run or drought at either position or a Browns’ trade down from either spot makes even speculation a wild goose chase. It seems the Browns are making plans for a number of contingencies, but it looks like offensive tackle and wide receiver — whatever the order — remain the top priorities 12 days out.
Chiefs Eyeing T At No. 9; Team Interested In Monroe Freeling
The Chiefs will have a number of options to consider when they find themselves drafting ninth overall next week. The possibility of adding an offensive tackle will likely present itself, and it will be something to monitor closely.
Executives and evaluators who spoke with SportsBoom’s Jason La Canfora predicted Kansas City’s top priority in the first round will be adding an offensive tackle. The receiver position is one which the Chiefs have been linked to in the pre-draft process, and it would come as no surprise if a pass rusher were to be selected early in the event. Spending a top-10 pick on a left tackle would be highly valuable as well, however.
Kansas City has Josh Simmons in the fold after taking him 32nd overall last year. The Ohio State product was limited to eight games during his rookie season, though, and adding another prospect would provide depth at the left tackle spot. The Chiefs have been linked to Trent Williams interest in the event his 49ers contractual situation is not resolved; free agent Taylor Decker has also been named as a short-term option on the blindside.
Kadyn Proctor is among the offensive line prospects Kansas City has hosted on a pre-draft visit. The Alabama alum is not expected to last beyond Detroit at No. 17, so the Chiefs would likely not be able to draft him when back on the clock at No. 29. Another offensive line option receiving consideration is Georgia’s Monroe Freeling. Mike Garafolo of NFL Network notes Kansas City is one of several teams which have shown interest in Freeling during the lead-up to the draft.
Freeling has seen his stock rise, and he is a strong candidate to hear his name called at some point on Day 1. Proctor, along with the likes of Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano, is also expected to be selected relatively early during the first round. The 2026 class is not held in high regard with respect to bluechip prospects at many positions, and the offensive line group offers view options projected to handle left tackle duties in particular in the NFL.
That could lead the Chiefs to prioritize an investment up front first while waiting for their other first-round selection to bring in a pass rusher or pass catcher. With plenty of uncertainty still lingering through the top-10 order, Kansas City’s approach will likely remain unclear for several more days.
Raiders Receiving Interest In No. 1 Pick
It happens almost every year. Months of pre-draft evaluation have established a clear top quarterback in the draft class who is projected to be drafted with the No. 1 pick. And then the trade offers come in.
This year, the QB1 is Indiana’s Fernando Mendoza, who has long been considered a lock for the Raiders with the first overall selection. That has not stopped teams from reaching out to Las Vegas about trading up, general manager John Spytek revealed on Tuesday.
“We’ve gotten a few calls, and those teams know where they stand,” Spytek said (via ESPN’s Ryan McFadden), an indication that the Raiders have no intention of moving their pick.
The Bears were willing to trade in the No. 1 overall pick in 2023, which resulted in a major blockbuster with the Panthers, who drafted Bryce Young. Among the picks sent to Chicago was Carolina’s 2024 first-rounder, which turned out to be the top pick that year. Again, the Bears fielded calls from teams who wanted to move up for Caleb Williams, but they never seemed to consider another trade down as a real option. The Patriots, who were drafting third, also received interest in their pick with teams looking to draft Drake Maye. Both teams stayed put and are likely thankful they did so.
The jury is still out on Tennessee resisting overtures for the No. 1 pick last year and sticking with Cam Ward. The Giants, who were among the teams who pursued Maye, sent multiple offers to the Titans all the way up until draft day. Presumably, their haul would have been similar to the Panthers’ package in 2023.
The Raiders should be able to receive that kind of value this year, especially in a draft class with only one consensus first-round quarterback. Next year’s draft offers a deeper crop of prospects to choose from, and trading the No. 1 pick would give them the ammunition to land a quarterback from that group.
But ultimately, a trade does not make sense for the Raiders. Between their coaching change and roster upgrades, they are positioned to have a much better season than their 3-14 2025 campaign, resulting in a lower first-round pick. With multiple teams targeting quarterbacks in the 2027 draft, it may be difficult for Las Vegas to land its desired prospect. Other teams may not be willing to trade down, and even if they are, the Raiders will have to outbid other suitors. That is a much more complicated and uncertain proposition than simply drafting Mendoza this year and calling it a day.
Spytek suggested that Las Vegas is thinking along the same lines.
“If there’s a player that stands out that we feel it’s not worth losing, it’s not worth even picking up the phone, then we’ll just make the pick,” Spytek continued. “But if it’s a player that we’re not as excited about, or there’s a group of players that we would love to pick from, and we can get value for that, we’re certainly open to listening to that.”
Ravens Running Out Of Time On Lamar Jackson Extension?
The Ravens have certainly had a busy offseason to start off the 2026 season so far, and some aspects of their offseason have been more successful than others. The franchise felt a need to reset their coaching staff and landed a promising, young defensive-minded coach much like the Super Bowl-winning one they let leave two years ago. The team saw holes on defense and the offensive line and added some strong options in free agency.
On the flip side of things, the expediency with which John Harbaugh found a new job set high expectations for the team that was willing to let him go. Additionally, a number of free agents priced themselves way out of Baltimore, while former staffers in both New York and Los Angeles poached away several other names that many expected to return. But the single biggest failure of the Ravens’ 2026 offseason so far, as laid out by Sports Illustrated’s Jason La Canfora, is the team’s inability to come to an agreement with star quarterback Lamar Jackson on a new, record-setting extension.
When the Ravens finally landed Jackson to his first record-setting extension in 2023, many expected that the star dual-threat passer would never even sniff the final years of his contract. With how quickly the quarterback market constantly readjusts with inflation, it was thought that it would be insulting if the Ravens didn’t see fit to make sure their best player remained in line with the rising market periodically. Especially when teams like the Chiefs and Bills had demonstrated some unique ways to accomplish this for everyone to see, Baltimore was sure to follow suit.
Instead, the issue has frequently been pushed by one party or the other to the back burner. What’s worse, this is not new for the Ravens, who similarly squeezed every ounce of value out of Jackson’s rookie deal even after seeing him win an MVP award in his second season with Marquise Brown, Willie Snead, Seth Roberts, and Miles Boykin leading his receivers room. According to La Canfora, “there isn’t anyone in the industry” who believes Jackson will be a Raven after this year if the team can’t extend him by the start of the season, and after the team restructured his deal, there’s belief that he holds more leverage than ever.
La Canfora also commented on the recent reports that Jackson was offered fully guaranteed three-year deals back when he was seeking his first extended contract. He asserted that not all fully guaranteed deals are equal, focusing on some of the language that was crucial to Jackson in those negotiations. Jackson was seeking a five-year, fully guaranteed deal, something the Ravens did not intend to offer. Instead, they made their three-year offers in the range of $50MM to $55MM per year.
While that still seems like a decent offer, La Canfora reports that it didn’t come with the “no trade” and “no future franchise tag” clauses that Jackson needed to see. He offers that teams only tend to include language like that when the contract guarantees long-term rights to the player’s services, and with Jackson’s insistence on a fully guaranteed deal, a long-term offer wasn’t coming. It became clear that those clauses were more important to him than the guarantees when he eventually agreed to his record-setting extension without full guarantees but with those clauses.
Those clauses essentially guaranteed that, no matter what, Jackson would be hitting the open market again just as he turned 30 — that is, unless he were to receive an extension before then. Jackson had some notion of where the big money would be and put himself in position to cash in at the best moments. The Ravens have had plenty of opportunities over the years to stretch a couple dollars now to avoid even bigger costs down the road, but they’ve continuously come up short, unable to meet Jackson’s demands. Now, they may be in a race against the clock to get a deal done before the start of the season or risk having to reset at quarterback just as they did at head coach. They saw how quickly Harbaugh went.
Giants, Dexter Lawrence Break Off Contract Talks; Latest On DT’s Trade Market
Although contract talks between the Giants and Dexter Lawrence were not perceived as dead as of Tuesday, the latest updates bring a step backward for the two parties. An impasse has given way to the sides ending this round of negotiations.
The Giants and Lawrence have broken off talks, according to the New York Daily News’ Pat Leonard. While Joe Schoen said Tuesday that he, John Harbaugh and new front office hire Dawn Aponte had been discussing terms with Lawrence, the All-Pro defensive tackle had requested a trade because the sides were far apart in previous conversations.
No trade is imminent, but Leonard adds significant interest exists from other teams. Even though Leonard adds there is a “real possibility” the Giants trade Lawrence, the New York Post’s Paul Schwartz pushes back by indicating the team is not actively engaged in trade talks. No trade conversations have occurred in at least five days, per Schwartz, who contradicts Leonard’s note about trade interest by writing that the 28-year-old DT has not in fact brought strong trade interest yet.
With Lawrence seeking a hefty raise despite coming off a down 2025 season, this trade market may have a lower cap than the Giants would prefer. A Quinnen Williams-like haul has been mentioned as a comp, but the fellow 2019 first-round D-tackle did not require an immediate payday. A team trading for Lawrence would need to sign off on a raise. We have seen that component of trade talks lead to lesser offers in the recent past, and the Giants are still controlling this operation. Lawrence’s camp has not received permission to shop around yet, Pro Football Talk’s Mike Florio notes.
Viewing Lawrence as a cornerstone piece, the Giants have balked at giving in to this trade request. This has not devolved into a situation where the team will take the best offer ahead of the draft, SNY’s Connor Hughes adds, and NFL.com’s Mike Garafolo mentions receiving picks in the 2027 draft — viewed as set to feature a better class than 2026’s — would probably appeal to the team. The Giants do not view the draft as a trade deadline here, despite the pressure Lawrence’s camp is applying. Lawrence’s four-year, $90MM contract runs through the 2027 season, and with the Giants preferring to keep him, Garafolo points to this process dragging on for a while.
Lawrence played out the guarantees on his deal last season, and Schoen said ahead of the Combine that would likely coincide with a push from the player’s camp for an updated deal. Guarantees may not be driving this push, though, with The Athletic’s Dan Duggan adding Lawrence sought a new contract last year despite guarantees remaining on the pact. Lawrence has pushed for a new contract for nearly two years, according to Leonard. He and the Giants settled on a $3MM incentive package; Lawrence collected $1MM during a season in which he totaled just a half-sack and a career-low eight QB hits.
Instead, this is more about a new contract that vaults Lawrence back toward the top of the position’s market. Lawrence’s 2023 extension now sits 11th among interior D-linemen, with less accomplished players — Milton Williams, Nnamdi Madubuike, Jordan Davis and Alim McNeill — surpassing him over the past three offseasons. A $5MM-plus AAV gap still exists between Chris Jones‘ $31.75MM-per-year deal and the field. Lawrence being interested in bridging that gap is understandable, but Schwartz maintains the Giants are not interested in tearing up his deal and authorizing a raise this year.
If the Giants do not trade Lawrence before or during the draft, the next stage in this showdown will be their June minicamp. If/when Lawrence does not show for that, rumors about a training camp holdout will likely emerge, but the standout defender would lose millions before the season if he followed through on that. A hold-in measure may not be especially relevant here, as those are generally reserved for players in negotiations. If the Giants are not interested in paying Lawrence this year, a hold-in may not be practical.
Although Schoen may be on shaky ground after the Harbaugh and Aponte hires stripped power from him, Schwartz adds the GM and HC agree on the team’s handling of this situation. It still appears the Giants are ready to force Lawrence’s hand and make him earn a new deal this season, but they are listening to offers. It will take a strong proposal to convince the team (31st in 2025 run defense) to move on before the draft. With this draft class not viewed as a DT-rich crop, big offers could come. But it does not sound like the Giants have fielded a host of them yet.
Jets Cancel Top-30 Visit With David Bailey
Draft rumors move quickly in the final weeks leading up to Day 1 of the big event. Just five days ago, Texas Tech edge rusher David Bailey became the betting favorite to land with the Jets at the No. 2 overall pick. Just this evening, Connor Hughes of SportsNet New York reported that the team had canceled a top-30 visit that Bailey was supposed to attend.
There’s a lot of unspoken context here that’s worth mentioning. Charean Williams of Pro Football Talk commented that “it is unclear when Bailey was scheduled to visit,” confirming that, if a top-30 visit with the Jets had been announced for Bailey, it hadn’t been widely reported. Considering, as well, that today was the final possible day teams could host prospects for top-30 visits, just after 5pm on the final day seems an odd time for this information to break. It just as easily could’ve been reported that they ran out of time to get in a visit with Bailey, or it could’ve gone unreported and unnoticed altogether.
As Ryan Dunleavy of New York Post Sports suggests, the meaning of this report could taken in very different ways. The most obvious meaning would be that the Jets don’t intend to draft Bailey and chose not to waste his time with a visit. It could also mean the exact opposite: that the Jets know all they need to know about the Red Raider pass rusher, and they don’t need an additional visit to feel secure in drafting him. Dunleavy points out that, because the Jets have the No. 2 overall pick and the top overall pick is all but written in stone, there isn’t much potential benefit to throwing up this smokescreen.
One thing such a smokescreen could instigate to potentially benefit the Jets is trade interest. There may be teams interested in trading up for a top pass rusher, and they may not want to settle for whoever isn’t taken between Bailey and Ohio State’s Arvell Reese. We’ve seen rumors that the Cardinals, Giants, and other teams in the top 10 have shown interest in trading down, and perhaps the Jets wanted to get their phones ringing, too, to see what might be available to them.
The headline caused a bit of a stir this evening, but it remains to be seen if it will affect the current betting lines associated with each pick and player. Regardless, the intent should become much more clear eight days from now, when a selection is announced for the No. 2 overall pick.
Steelers Meet With QB Drew Allar
Today was the final day for teams to host 2026 NFL Draft prospects for top 30 visits, where they can evaluate future draft picks with a final round of interviews and medical evaluations. On this last day, as the Steelers continue to anticipate a concrete plan for veteran Aaron Rodgers, Penn State quarterback Drew Allar made his way to Pittsburgh for a final visit, per Tom Pelissero of NFL Network.
This isn’t any sort of pointed message directed at Rodgers. Allar is not one of the two quarterbacks in his draft class expected to go within the first two rounds. Fernando Mendoza will almost certainly be the top overall pick for the Raiders, and Ty Simpson could go anywhere from the mid-first to early second-round, a range in which the Steelers don’t seem to be willing to draft him. Allar is in a group of passers in the next tier, with fellow quarterbacks Carson Beck and Garrett Nussmeier. Some have also included Cade Klubnik in this group, as well.
Each prospect in that third tier has his own reason for not being up there with, at least, Simpson. Beck’s ceiling has been called into question, as has his ability to make something happen after plays break down. After a strong first year as a starter, Nussmeier, showed how much he can impact games in good and bad ways, and he saw himself benched with injury, as a result. Allar spent his career oozing with potential, showing glimpses of what he could develop into, but never was able to put it all together and find offensive success at a high level.
ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler perfectly encapsulated Allar’s outlook by calling him “polarizing” but with “upside.” Per Fowler, there are some in the league who believe that Allar “has a footwork issue that can be fixed” and that getting him into the “right place/system” will finally unlock the potential Allar harnesses. Scouts have noted an issue where sloppy footwork puts his feet out of sync with his eyes and can take accuracy and power away from his throws. He has room for improvement in other areas, as well, but it appears there’s an idea that fixing the footwork is the key to unlocking the rest.
If taken by Pittsburgh, Allar would join Mason Rudolph and Will Howard as likely backups in a quarterbacks room presumably led by the eventual re-signed starter, Rodgers. The Steelers haven’t had a ton of success developing quarterbacks since Ben Roethlisberger retired, but new head coach Mike McCarthy is much more experienced in the process than Mike Tomlin ever was, so who knows what’s to come in Pittsburgh in 2026.
T Caleb Lomu Completes 10-Visit Itinerary
Wednesday marks the final opportunity for teams to conduct “30” visits, and the 49ers received the latest meeting with Utah’s Caleb Lomu. While San Francisco met with the Utah tackle Tuesday night, many other teams brought in the first-round talent during the pre-draft process.
We covered Lomu’s Browns and Eagles meetings, and NFL.com’s Ian Rapoport confirms the college LT also met with the Bears, Chiefs, Dolphins, Lions, Panthers, Rams and Texans. One of several tackles viewed as first-round options, Lomu checks in as a blindside option (well, for everyone but the Falcons) compared to some of this class’ other top targets — who have played right tackle and been linked to potential guard shifts.
A two-year LT starter at Utah, Lomu earned first-team All-Big 12 honors in 2025. He did not allow a sack last year, per Dane Brugler of The Athletic. The 6-foot-6 blocker joins Spencer Fano as ex-Utes projected to be first-round picks. Lomu did not dabble in RT work, making all 24 of his collegiate starts on the left side while Fano manned the RT post. Lomu checks in 26th on Daniel Jeremiah’s NFL.com big board, sitting behind Francis Mauigoa (10th), Fano (13th), Blake Miller (19th), Monroe Freeling (20th) and Kadyn Proctor (22nd) among tackles.
The Chiefs continue to be connected to tackles — on both sides, as their Trent Williams ties remind — and the team is at least considering using a high draft choice to replace the since-released Jawaan Taylor (now a Falcon). Jaylon Moore remains an option in K.C., which has 2025 first-round pick Josh Simmons tentatively slated to continue starting at LT. Kansas City holds the Nos. 9 and 29 overall picks.
The Rams, who traded No. 29 to the Chiefs, sit at No. 13. They have Alaric Jackson at LT and Warren McClendon slated to succeed Rob Havenstein at RT. The Lions (No. 17) are in need — most likely at right tackle — after Taylor Decker‘s release, a move likely set to precede Penei Sewell sliding to LT. The Panthers (No. 19) signed Rasheed Walker as an Ikem Ekwonu stopgap; RT Taylor Moton‘s 2025 extension runs through 2027. Ozzy Trapilo is expected to miss most of the 2026 season following a patellar tendon tear, though the Bears re-signed Braxton Jones to compete with Theo Benedet — as of now, at least — at LT.
Miami (No. 11) rosters Patrick Paul but has Austin Jackson in a contract year; the veteran RT accepted a pay cut last month. Houston has struggled up front for a bit and has been connected to further bolstering its group via the draft. The Texans traded up for Aireontae Ersery last year and signed Braden Smith at right tackle (as 2024 second-rounder Blake Fisher has been unable to commandeer that gig).
Lastly, the 49ers are at least in need of a possible long-term LT solution. They continue to negotiate with Williams, who is heading into an age-38 season and the final year of his reworked contract. Colton McKivitz is going into a fourth season as San Francisco’s right tackle.
Broncos Were ‘Shocked’ Travis Etienne Signed Elsewhere?
As part of a mass retention effort, the Broncos re-signed J.K. Dobbins by giving their primary 2025 starting running back a deal that nearly quadrupled his ’25 contract in terms of fully guaranteed money ($8MM). But Dobbins does not appear to have been Denver’s first choice at the position.
The Broncos were tied to Breece Hall, with a previous report indicating the Jets slapped the franchise tag on their four-year starter in part to avoid a potential bidding war with Denver. Travis Etienne then brought connections to the Broncos, who indeed pursued the five-year Jaguar. The Saints, however, ended up signing the former first-round pick on a four-year, $48MM deal that included $24MM guaranteed at signing.
Etienne’s full guarantee ranks fifth among RBs, and it would stand to reason the Broncos — as they did with 2025 Saints signee Juwan Johnson — helped drive this market. The Broncos were “shocked” Etienne went elsewhere rather than signing with them, an NFL exec informed The Athletic’s Mike Sando.
Had Etienne accepted the Broncos’ offer, he would have been positioned as the starter in a tandem with RJ Harvey. Although Etienne joined a Saints team still rostering Alvin Kamara, it is far from certain the former Pro Bowler will be part of New Orleans’ roster for a 10th season. The Saints have Kendre Miller and 2025 sixth-rounder Devin Neal rostered as well.
Sean Payton was in charge when the Saints gave Kamara his first extension — a five-year, $75MM pact in 2020 — and he also signed off on the team re-signing Mark Ingram in 2015. The Broncos have a recent history with lower-cost or rookie-deal backs, with Dobbins playing for barely $2MM last season. Denver let Javonte Williams walk prior to signing Dobbins. Before Dobbins’ second deal with the team, Denver’s most notable RB contract came when Melvin Gordon signed a two-year, $16MM deal in 2020. The Gordon contract did not pan out, and while neither Payton nor GM George Paton was in place when that contract was finalized, it certainly appears the current Broncos regime were prepared to make a sizable investment.
It just does not look like the Broncos offered $24MM guaranteed at signing. As it stands, Dobbins and Harvey will reprise a 2025 tandem; Denver also retained both Jaleel McLaughlin and Tyler Badie. It remains to be seen whether the Broncos will attempt to add a bigger back in the draft to complement Harvey beyond 2026 and/or serve as Dobbins insurance — which was lacking after the injury-prone back’s Lisfranc injury last year. But such a move would make sense for a Denver team with Super Bowl aspirations and few glaring needs.